Blog

Allen Murphy Law - driven. focused. fearless
429 S. Keller Rd Suite 300
Orlando, FL 32810

Orlando Medical Malpractice Law Firm serving:
Orange County • Seminole County • Volusia County • Osceola County • Brevard County • Lake County • Hillsborough County • Duval County • Polk County • Sumter County • Marion County • Altamonte Springs • Apopka • Bartow • Bushnell • Celebration • Clermont • Conway • Daytona Beach • Deland • Eustis • Haines City • Kissimmee • Lake Mary • Lake Wales • Leesburg • Mount Dora • Oakland • Ocoee • Sanford • St. Cloud • Tavares • The Villages • Viera • Windermere • Winter Garden • Winter Park

Family Files Medical Malpractice Lawsuit Over Delay in Diagnosis of Stroke

An Orlando Medical Malpractice Attorney and Orlando Failure to Diagnose Lawyer are following a lawsuit filed last week in Oregon on behalf of a young woman permanently disabled after suffering a stroke.

News reached Orlando about the medical malpractice lawsuit which alleged that a hospital the woman had visited prior to suffering the stroke failed to recognize the warning signs or perform proper testing.

An Orlando medical malpractice attorney often helps families affected by a surgical error, failure to diagnose a disease or negligent treatment. An Orlando birth injury lawyer can also help when a child is injured during delivery.

In the case of a doctor or hospital staffs’ failure to diagnose a serious condition, a lawyer must show that the professionals did not use reasonable standards of care that other doctors would have normally used.

This failure to diagnose lawsuit centers around Danielle Elliott and her visit to Sacred Heart Medical Center on October 29, 2010. Elliot had complained of nausea, vomiting, a seizure and recurring headaches for four days. However, she was discharged and sent home after being checked by a doctor.

The next day, according to the lawsuit, Elliott presented back to the hospital after having suffered additional seizures, the loss of movement in her left side, clenching of her jaw and decreased responsiveness. She underwent emergency surgery but had already suffered considerable damage.

The lawsuit, which was filed by Danielle’s father Dale, claims she suffered a stroke which resulted in brain damage, permanent paralysis, and the loss of abilities to talk, eat and breathe normally. She has also undergone multiple surgeries.

The lawsuit seeks $32.5 million for past and future treatment as well as compensatory and punitive damages. It claims her condition may have been prevented but for the delay in treatment and inadequate treatment she received at Sacred Heart Medical Center.

Among the defendants named in the case are PeaceHealth Inc., who owns and operates the hospital, Eugene Emergency Physicians, and several doctors who reportedly examined Elliott.

Representatives for the hospital declined to comment on the case.

Family Settles Medical Malpractice Lawsuit over Ignored Heart Monitor

Your Orlando Medical Malpractice Attorney is reporting the settlement of a medical malpractice lawsuit that involved the death of an elderly man in Boston after hospital staff ignored an alarm indicating he was in cardiac arrest.

An Orlando medical malpractice attorney or Orlando birth injury lawyer often handles cases where a family member suffered injury or death by the negligence of hospital staff. They also help file claims when children suffer a birth injury or a patient is injured through surgical error or failure to diagnose a serious disease.

Most troubling, however, is the recent increase in patient injuries and deaths relating to abandonment by hospital intake personnel, nurses or even doctors due to insurance disputes.

A medical malpractice lawsuit or birth injury lawsuit can be just as effective in a situation where a lack or action causes injury or death as when the direct actions by doctors or staff cause that loss.

This case was filed in Massachusetts by the family of an 89-year-old man who passed away after he suffered cardiac arrest while under the care of the staff at Massachusetts General Hospital. Again, it was the failure of the healthcare professionals to act rather than their actions that led to his death.

In the lawsuit, the man’s family alleged that a cardiac monitor that he was connected to sounded an alarm for nurses, but no one came to his attention or provided treatment until it was too late.

Hospitals refer to this growing problem as “alarm fatigue” since the frequency of patient monitor alarms sometimes causes overworked hospital staff to ignore them. However, the results can be fatal.

According to the medical malpractice lawyer for the family, the hospital admitted its mistake and is taking steps to try to avoid similar accidents in the future. Massachusetts General also agreed to settle the claim by the man’s family for $850,000.

The settlement, which was reached by the parties in May but not filed with the court or disclosed until this month, was paid by the insurer for Harvard teaching hospitals for the doctors and staff involved as well.

Court Allows Medical Malpractice Lawsuit Over Seizing of Newborn to Proceed

Most often families who hire an Orlando Medical Malpractice Lawyer or Orlando Birth Injury Attorney do so to help recover damages from an injury or death caused by medical mistake, hospital error, doctor negligence or lack of care.

Thousands of families have relied on an Orlando Medical Malpractice Lawyer or Orlando Birth Injury Attorney after surgical error, failure to diagnose a disease, or decisions made by a doctor during birth led to a birth injury.

In several recent cases, however, families have sought the help of lawyers to protect their constitutional rights after misguided child protection agencies took their children at birth due to mistaken drug tests. Courts are increasingly allowing these lawsuits to proceed.

A Pennsylvania mother this year filed a lawsuit after a child protective services agency took her newborn son for nearly three months. The county agency was responding to a drug screening test given during delivery which showed the presence of opiates.

However, it was later shown that the mother, Eileen Bower, had eaten a salad with poppy seeds right before going into labor. The harmless food is notorious for producing false-positive drug tests for opiates.

Bower cleared the matter up and her son was returned, but not until 75 days after his birth. Her lawsuit alleges civil rights violations against the hospital, county agency, and caseworker who took her son. In a decision last week, a federal judge ruled that the lawsuit could proceed.

In a similar case, another Pennsylvania couple is suing the same hospital, agency and caseworker after their daughter was taken from them shortly after birth. In that case, the mother had also tested positive for opiates after consuming a bagle with poppy seeds.

In addition to the civil rights violations, both families had also raised allegations of negligence and invasion of privacy against the hospital, agency and caseworker. In one case the hospital was dismissed from the negligence case while in another they were allowed out of the invasion of privacy claim.

Parents File Birth Injury Lawsuit Against Winter Haven Hospital

Parents of a child injured during a complicated birth in a Winter Haven hospital in 2009 have filed a birth injury medical malpractice lawsuit with the help of an Orlando Birth Injury Lawyer and Orlando Medical Malpractice Attorney.

Although an Orlando Birth Injury Lawyer and Orlando Medical Malpractice Attorney mostly assists families in the greater Orlando area, they are also able to represent those all over Central Florida and the rest of the state when needed.

Orlando birth injury lawsuits often involve cerebral palsy, Erb’s Palsy, Shoulder Dystocia or Brachial Plexus injuries that can occur when doctors and staff fail to timely act during a vaginal birth complication.

Orlando medical malpractice lawsuits can involve many other types of injuries caused by medical mistake, surgical error, failure to diagnose a disease or negligence by doctors or hospital staff. It is estimated that medical mistakes are one of the biggest sources of injury and death in this country.

This medical malpractice birth injury lawsuit was filed this month by Nely and Efrain Martinez of Winter Haven against Winter Haven Hospital, Dr. Mark Palazzolo and Osceola OB/GYN.

The lawsuit alleges that the hospital, doctor and staff were negligent in timely recognizing their son’s birth complications during delivery, failing to deliver him fast enough and using excessive force on his head and shoulder.

According to the lawsuit, their son, born in 2009, suffered shoulder dystocia during the delivery which caused a brachial plexus injury. Such conditions can lead to paralyzation or weakness in the upper extremities and sometimes require surgery to correct.

Dr. Palazzolo is board certified with the American Osteopathic Board of Obstetrics and does not have a record of any disciplinary actions on his state license. The hospital, doctor and OB/GYN practice have not issued a statement at this time.

Check back for further updates to this story as the ongoing lawsuit develops.

Florida Woman Paralyzed After Hospital Visit Settles Medical Malpractice Lawsuit

An Orlando Medical Malpractice Attorney is reporting today that a high-profile lawsuit in South Florida has been settled which involved a woman paralyzed from an alleged lack of care at a hospital.

Although Orlando Birth Injury Attorneys and medical malpractice lawyers often help families with cases of birth defect, surgical error and negligent treatment, cases of failure to diagnose and properly treat a condition are also common.

This case was filed by Sheila Matthews of Naples against Naples Community Healthcare System and physicians Daniel Singer, Michael Vickers and Sunil Pandya. Matthews, who is now 61 years old, called for an ambulance in March of 2005 with complaints of shortness of breath and extreme back pain.

Although she was able to walk to the ambulance outside of her home she left the hospital several days later unable to walk.

Records show that Matthews suffered from diabetes and bipolar disorder prior to her hospitalization, but developed a spinal abscess which doctors failed to identify or treat in time. She claimed that, although she was screaming with pain, doctors didn’t consider her condition an emergency and therefore allowed it to worsen for six days.

After six days Matthews was finally administered an MRI which showed progressive neurological deterioration and the spinal abscess. She underwent emergency decompressive surgery to regain some movement in an arm, but was left unable to walk.

Matthews had originally settled her case against Naples Community Healthcare System prior to trial. When word of this settlement leaked to jurors during her trial against the remaining three doctors, the verdict in favor of the defendants was thrown out and Matthews was granted a new trial by Circuit Judge Cynthia Pivacek.

The new trial was set to begin in January of 2012, however, court records indicate the defendants were dismissed last week after the parties reached a resolution. Neither side is discussing any terms of the confidential settlements, however, an estimate of the medical expenses for Matthews’ life care came in at $4.7 million.

Infection Amputee Victim Awarded $23 Million in Medical Malpractice Case for Negligent Nursing

Medical safety advocates are applauding the recent jury decision in a Pennsylvania medical malpractice lawsuit that punished a hospital and home health care company for negligent care resulting in a woman losing parts of both legs.

In Florida, victims and families with injuries from medical mistake, birth injuries, surgical error and failure to diagnose diseases can seek the help of an Orlando Medical Malpractice Attorney or Orlando Birth Injury Lawyer.

This case was filed by a 55 year old woman after a bloodstream infection in 2008 nearly ended her life. The woman, who was receiving home health care for complications from Crohn’s disease from St. Luke’s Miners Memorial Home Care, claimed that a nurse for the company missed the infection.

The woman alleged that a bacterial infection developed in her feeding catheter, but the problem went unnoticed and unreported by the home care nurse for St. Lukes. The infection eventually resulted in the patient having parts of both of her legs amputated to save her from spread of the virus.

She filed a medical malpractice lawsuit against the nurse and St. Lukes Home Care to compensate for her past and future medical expenses, lost earnings as well as pain and suffering.

Last week, a Pennsylvania jury found the defendants liable for her injuries and awarded her $23.1 million.

Attorneys representing the woman commented that they hoped the decision would lead to St. Lukes and other healthcare companies giving more attention to efforts to prevent infections in home care patients.

A representative for St. Lukes offered his condolences for the victim on behalf of the hospital, but indicated the company thought the verdict by the jury to be excessive. The company reiterated its position that the nurse acted within the appropriate standards of care.

It is not known at this time whether the hospital plans to appeal the verdict reached by the jury in this case. Check back for further updates to this story.

Couple Files Medical Malpractice Lawsuit over Deadly Transplant

As political pressure from businesses and conservative lawmakers mounts to restrict access to courts and fair verdicts by victims of medical malpractice, lawyers like your Orlando Medical Malpractice Attorney and Orlando Birth Injury Lawyer are watching lawsuits filed in other states.

In one such recent lawsuit, a woman and her boyfriend from Pennsylvania are suing a hospital after a kidney transplant left him infected with hepatitis C. Although the infected kidney came from his girlfriend, the couple allege that the hospital overlooked test results that could have prevented the infection.

Families in Florida often call on an Orlando Birth Injury Attorney or Orlando Medical Malpractice lawyer for help after a loved one has died or been seriously injured by medical mistakes, surgical error, failure to diagnose fatal diseases, or lack of proper treatment.

This recent lawsuit was filed this week by 40 year old Christina Mecannic and 50 year old Michael Yocabet of Pennsylvania against the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and several doctors and medical staff.

The case surrounds the April 6 kidney transplant in which Mecannic donated a kidney to Yocabet. The operation was needed to save his life after dialysis had failed to help with his kidney disease caused by type I diabetes.

Unfortunately, doctors and hospital staff missed the results of a January 26 preoperative blood test which revealed that Mecannic had hepatitis C. Such a discovery would have caused her to be disqualified as a donor. Instead, a surgeon told Mecannic that she would be an “excellent” match for a transplant.

Because of the disease, Yocabet faces treatment which could cause the failure of the new kidney and ultimately, death.

The actual transplant surgery was a success and both Mecannic and Yocabet were released from the hospital within days. It wasn’t until further testing on April 22 and April 29 that the hospital discovered Mecannic and Yocabet had the virus.

Further, the lawsuit alleges that, rather than informing the couple immediately of the test results, they called Mecannic into a meeting on May 6 and accused her of infidelity towards her partner of 21 years and father of their 18 year old child. They also reportedly accused her of cocaine use, both of which she strongly denies.

Mecannic alleges that hospital staff also gave her the option of keeping the hepatitis C diagnosis a secret from Yocabet, which she refused on the basis that the news could affect his future health.

Mecannic claims she had no prior knowledge of her hepatitis C and suspects that she may have contracted the virus from years of exposure to blood working as a licensed practical nurse at nursing homes.

Representatives from UPMC have denied that they tried to cover up the mistake. Instead, they claim they have suspended procedures at the kidney and liver transplant center for several months, notified authorities, and demoted a surgeon and nurse.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently announced stricter pre-operative screening and organ testing guidelines for donors to detect hepatitis C , hepatitis B and HIV.

Woman Settles Medical Malpractice Cases Relating to Birth Injury

Orlando Birth Injury Lawyers and Orlando Medical Malpractice Attorneys are reporting that a settlement has been reached in a Medical Malpractice lawsuit and birth injury lawsuit they were following this year.

The lawsuit was filed against two hospitals in Las Vegas after they allegedly delayed treatment and refused to screen a pregnant woman who later gave birth to a premature child at home. The baby, born at less than 2 pounds, passed away.

The woman has told reporters that she didn’t even know she was pregnant. However, the case received national attention after similar stories of patient neglect surfaced from other hospitals in Las Vegas and as far away as New York.

The lawsuits were filed in Federal Court by Roshunda Abney against Valley Hospital and University Medical Center.

In November, 2009 Abney had gone first to University Medical Center complaining of abdominal pains, but was never screened for pregnancy and was told that she may have to wait for at least six hours. Allegations center around a staffer described as being especially rude since Abney didn’t have health insurance.

Abney and her fiancé, Raffinee Dewberry, who was the child’s father, then went to nearby Valley Hospital. They were told by staff there that they would probably face a similar wait time, again with no screen performed.

The couple felt that they were not going to get treatment, therefore they left Valley hospital and returned home after purchasing some over-the-counter pain medication. It was there that Abney gave birth to her daughter, who died soon after.

Abney’s lawsuits sought an unspecified amount from both hospitals based on their failed duty to properly screen and treat her under the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act.

In August of this year, she settled the lawsuit against University Medical Center for a total of $225,000. Last week, she also settled the case with Valley Hospital as her and her lawyers were set to begin trail.

According to medical malpractice and birth injury lawyers representing Abney and Valley Hospital, they reached an agreement to resolve the case prior to the opening of trail. As the settlement was confidential, the amount was not disclosed. However, experts estimate it may have been around the same amount as the UMC settlement.

Check back for updates to this story as additional information is made available.

Family Files Medical Malpractice Lawsuit After Mother’s Death From Birth Injury

Orlando Birth Injury Lawyers and Orlando Medical Malpractice Attorneys are keeping an eye on a tragic lawsuit recently filed in North Carolina which carries elements of everything from birth injury to medical malpractice and wrongful death.

The medical malpractice birth injury lawsuit involves the wrongful death of a mother soon after giving birth to her son by a cesarean section by an injury caused during the cesarean section.

The lawsuit was filed last week in Surry County, North Carolina against Hugh Chatham Memorial Hospital and Dr. Peter McIlveen alleging that negligence during and after the surgery led to the death of Kelly Jarvis.

According to the lawsuit, 31 year old Jarvis went to the hospital in March of 2009 for delivery, and her son was born healthy after a cesarean section. However, the suit also alleges that Dr. McIlveen inflicted a birth injury when he severed part of her small intestine during the routine surgery.

Following the delivery, the suit charges that Jarvis suffered intense abdominal pains and many other complications which were ignored or not properly handled by the hospital staff and doctor.

Jarvis eventually passed away from complications just five days after the birth of her son. She is also survived by her husband who is the administrator of her estate and filed the lawsuit on her behalf.

The lawsuit alleges that Jarvis unfortunate death was completely avoidable and would have been prevented but for the negligent actions and subsequent inaction of the doctor and hospital workers.

Medical facilities and health care workers found liable of negligent treatment can be held accountable for the injuries or death caused by their treatment. Here, the family is attempting to recover for Ms. Jarvis’ injuries, suffering, wrongful death and the loss caused on her family.

Medical Malpractice Lawsuit Alleges Hospital Missed Signs of Infant Abuse

Orlando Birth Injury Attorneys and Orlando Medical Malpractice Lawyers are monitoring the progress of a saddening lawsuit recently filed in Des Moines, Iowa to see if they may offer additional services to their clients.

While Orlando birth injury lawsuits and Orlando Medical Malpractice lawsuits generally involve injury inflicted upon a patient by the actions of a doctor or hospital, this case raises the question of whether a hospital can be held liable for failing to recognize the signs of child abuse inflicted by someone else.

The case, filed against Mercy Medical Center in Des Moines, alleges that the failure of the hospital to recognize and report signs of severe child abuse led to irreparable injury to a toddler who is now in the foster care of new parents.

The lawsuit was filed by Shannon and Danny Nelson, who are the aunt and uncle and now guardians of Ethan Neiderbach. Ethan, who is now two years old, suffered severe brain damage as an infant due to abuse.

The couple says Ethan suffered other injury due to abuse prior to his brain injury and that the hospital could have picked up on this which would have saved him from later, irreparable harm.

Ethan was taken to the hospital in June of 2009 with a broken arm. While he was there for treatment, the lawsuit alleges, doctors failed to examine him for any signs of abuse, which is a common practice for toddlers with injuries,

As a result, the case alleges he was returned back to an unsafe family environment where he underwent additional abuse. Within a few weeks, Ethan was rushed back to Mercy Medical Center with a severe brain injury after significant abuse.

The couple charges that the failure of doctors and staff at the facility to properly check for signs of abuse put him at further risk for injury and led to his permanent condition.

The family has sued for an unspecified amount of damages that they say will help pay for Ethan’s past and future medical expenses as well as the mental and physical pain and suffering he has undergone.

Ethan's biological mother and father, who are alleged to have caused the abuse, are Jherica Richardson and Jonas Neiderbach. Richardson is serving 20 years in prison for child endangerment and Neiderbach, is set to be sentenced this month for child endangerment.

Medical Malpractice Lawsuit Filed Over Birth Injury Death of Infant

Orlando Medical Malpractice Attorneys and Orlando Birth Injury Lawyers are following a lawsuit filed this week in Nevada alleging the wrongful death of an infant from a birth injury due to the medical malpractice of a hospital in its failure to properly screen and treat the mother.

The lawsuit marks the second in just several weeks against the same hospital, University Medical Center. Both allege that the hospital failed to give timely and proper care to expectant mothers, which resulted in them giving birth prematurely to infants who passed away.

The most recent lawsuit was filed by a medical malpractice attorney on behalf of Latricia Richard of Las Vegas in the Nevada Federal District Court surrounding her visit to the hospital last December.

According to the lawsuit, Richards presented to UMC at just after 10:00 pm on December 8, 2010 with complaints of abdominal and labor pains. At that time she was already 22 weeks along in her pregnancy.

However, the suit alleges, instead of being attended to by a physician or even a specialized nursing professional, Richards was put into a room and in the obstetrician department and put on a fetal monitor.

The suit also charges that at no time did the hospital did measure Richard’s cervix to see how far it had dilated. Instead, she was simply given a sleeping pill and discharges to go home.

After being sent home from the hospital around 3:30 am that morning, Richard continued to have discomfort. She went to her private physician later that morning and it was determined that she was actively in labor.

Richard’s obstetrician/gynecologist immediately called an ambulance to take her back to UMC due to her advanced labor. However, upon giving birth to her premature daughter, the infant passed away.

The lawsuit alleges among other things that UMC violated the Federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) by failing to adequately screen and treat Richard. Had they done so, the suit charges, her infant might have lived.

Representatives of UMC have declined to issue a comment on the lawsuit.

Medical Malpractice Lawsuit Filed Against Hospital for Bed Sores resulting in Death of 60 Year Old Woman

Orlando Medical Malpractice Lawyers and Orlando Wrongful Death Attorneys often counsel family of those who have been the victim of medical mistakes during the course of diagnosis or treatment.

Most times the injury or death in these cases is due to a mistake made by a doctor or hospital staff. While it is little consolation to the family of a dead or severely injured patient, at least the family can rest in the fact that a mistake was made while medical professionals were trying their best to help the patient.

Such is not the case with situations of medical neglect. In these tragic cases, family members are left with the horrifying memory of their loved one passing away due to being ignored or mistreated by hospital staff. Such is the case with a medical malpractice lawsuit recently filed in Maine.

One of the most common signs of medical neglect or improper treatment in a facility is the occurrence of bed sores. Bedsores are preventable wounds that develop when blood flow is restricted to an area of the body, usually due to extended pressure.

Bedsores most often appear in areas where bones protrude beneath the skin, such as near the elbows, tailbone or heels. They are prevented by moving and rotating a patient often during bed rest or recovery, and can be treated quite easily if discovered early.

Bedsores pose more of a risk when they are left unnoticed or untreated and develop into open sores. This often occurs in patients in nursing homes or hospitals who have limited mobility.

Untreated sores invite infection to enter the wounds and subsequently the bloodstream, which then becomes more difficult to treat. Such progression of serious infections can prove fatal in patients with diminished health.

In this case, medical malpractice lawyers representing Robert Vozzella filed the wrongful death lawsuit alleging that his 60 year old wife Judith died from bedsore infection after undergoing surgery for a stroke in 2009 at Portsmouth Regional Hospital.

The lawsuit alleges that, following surgery, a physician assistant ordered that Vozzella not be turned for three days to prevent bedsores. After lying sedated for days, she ultimately did develop the sores but they went unnoticed for at least three days.

After Vozzella developed an infection from the sores, she underwent multiple surgeries over several months but ultimately passed away when the bedsores became infected with fecal contamination.

The medical malpractice wrongful death lawsuit names the hospital, the attending physician assistants and the surgical group who performed her original surgery.

Florida Lawmakers Propose Important Limits on Medical Malpractice Rights

Orlando Medical Malpractice Lawyers and Orlando Birth Injury Attorneys are concerned that a new bill passed by the Florida Legislature will severely limit the rights of their clients to recover for the mistakes of hospitals and their staff.

The bill, titled Senate Bill 1676, previously passed the Senate and sailed through the House on Wednesday with a vote of 94-21. It will now go to Governor Rick Scott for signature which many believe will essentially be a rubber stamp approval.

The new law extends lawsuit limits that had previously only covered public hospitals to university teaching hospitals as well. Under the state protection, any medical malpractice or birth injury lawsuit awarding more than $100,000 per person or $200,000 per incident would have to be approved by the legislature.

The public protection portion of the law will likely extend to 6 hospitals around the state: Shands Hospital at the University of Florida, Jackson Memorial in Miami, Mount Sinai Medical Center in Miami Beach, Shands Hospital in Jacksonville, Orlando Health Center in Orlando, and Tampa General Hospital.

Legal experts are worried that the law will further shield doctors and medical facilities that practice recklessly and cause serious injury or death to their patients. This follows caps on medical malpractice and birth injury lawsuits previously enacted by Governor Bush.

Insiders also fear that the protection afforded by the law will prompt more and more hospitals to seek status as teaching hospitals in order to skirt liability for medical mistakes.

Injury from medical negligence is on the rise and is one of the leading causes of injury and death in the United States. In many cases of serious medical injury the damages to the victim and their family far exceed the caps allowed in this bill.

Also passed as part of the reform on medical liability was a bill allowing state regulation of expert medical witnesses used in medical malpractice and birth injury lawsuits. Previously, experts were free to form their own opinions guided only by the standards of their medical expertise.

Under the new law, any medical experts that offer testimony in a lawsuit which is found to be deceptive could face the loss of their license and possible disciplinary action in future cases.

While this appears on its face to be necessary regulation, legal experts point out that it will have the effect of discouraging qualified medical experts from offering their honest opinion in many cases due to fear of reprisal.

Judge Tosses Lawsuit over Baby Breastfeeding Mixup

Most often, when a family hires an Orlando Medical Malpractice Attorney to file a medical malpractice lawsuit or an Orlando Birth Injury Lawyer to file a birth injury lawsuit, it relates to a significant medical mistake.

Your Orlando medical malpractice lawyer is available to help if you or a family member has suffered injury, death or a severe birth injury as a result of a medical mistake by a doctor or hospital staff. This often comes in the form of surgical error, failure to diagnose a disease or medical negligence.

Many people think, however, that you can file a medical malpractice or birth injury lawsuit if there is any type of mistake or wrongdoing on the part of the doctor or hospital staff.

Unfortunately, there are some cases that your Orlando birth injury attorney can’t help you with. In order to prevail in a lawsuit, you, your family or your infant need to have suffered a real injury.

This was highlighted in a recent case in New York where a woman tried to file a medical malpractice lawsuit against a hospital that accidentally gave her newborn infant to the wrong mother.

While cases of switched infants are well known and can be traumatic on the families involved, they do occur and almost always are remedied in a short amount of time before any damage takes place.

In this case, the infant mix up resulted in the newborn being given to the wrong mother for her first breastfeeding, however no other damage occurred. A court ruled that this was not enough to prove damages.

The case started when Lydia Williams of Brooklyn, NY filed a medical malpractice lawsuit against Long Island College Hospital. Her and her husband are claiming mental distress and emotional disturbance after a nurse briefly gave their daughter to the wrong mother by accident after her 2008 birth

The surrogate mother gave the child its’ first breastfeeding, but the true mother and child were quickly reunited. The mother, however, is incensed that the hospital didn’t offer enough apology and couldn’t prove that the other mother was disease-free due to patient privacy restrictions.

A judge with the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division court threw out the case, ruling that the woman and her husband did not show any true injury as a result of the mix up.

The woman and her husband, however, still infuriated over the mistake and wanting compensation, have vowed to appeal the decision.

Family Files Medical Malpractice Lawsuit over Infant Birth Injury Death

Orlando medical malpractice attorneys and Orlando birth injury lawyers are following a medical malpractice lawsuit recently filled in Illinois that deals with the wrongful death of an infant after the medical mistake of a hospital in dispensing a bag of intravenous fluid.

An Orlando medical malpractice lawsuit that deals with the injury or death of an infant usually involves a birth injury to a newborn caused by the mistake or delay in proper treatment of a doctor or hospital staff during birth.

In this lawsuit, however, a young child was fatally injured as doctors and hospital staff attempted to treat him after he was born prematurely. In such a case, the victims or family still have the right to recover for their loss.

The medical malpractice lawsuit was filed in Cook County, Illinois against Advocate Lutheran General Hospital by the parents of a 6 week old child who died in the facility on October 15, 2010.

According to the lawsuit, the infant passed away after hospital staff gave him an IV bag which contained approximately 60 times the concentration of sodium than had been ordered by the treating doctor.

The infant, Genesis Burkett, was born prematurely in the same hospital approximately 6 weeks before and was undergoing treatment to recover. His parents had dealt with the tragedy of several failed pregnancies before finally giving birth to Genesis. Despite his premature condition, they claim he was recovering well.

According to the lawsuit, the error occurred when a hospital pharmacy technician incorrectly filled an order by the child’s doctor for the IV fluid with the high-sodium formula.

The label that was placed on the bag when it was first filled, however, indicated the high amount of sodium in the mixture. For some reason, a second label was affixed over the first which did not indicate the high concentration. Therefore, the administering nurse did not know of the dose that proved fatal.

Representatives from the hospital acknowledged that an error occurred and stated that they had kept the family in their prayers. The attorney representing the family indicated they were devastated by the loss and that they intended to prove medical malpractice.

Medical Malpractice Lawsuit Filed Over Birth Injury Death from Lack of Care

Orlando medical malpractice lawyers and Orlando birth injury attorneys are keeping track of a medical negligence type birth injury lawsuit that was filed recently in Federal Court alleging the tragic death of an infant after treatment was delayed to her parents at two hospitals.

The medical malpractice lawsuit was filed last week by a Nevada woman against two hospitals in Las Vegas – Valley Hospital and University Medical Center. The suit alleges that she was treated rudely and turned away by staff at both hospitals before giving birth at home to an infant who died.

In the birth injury death lawsuit, Roshunda Abney alleges that she and Raffinee Dewberry presented to University Medical Center last November 30th after being referred by an affiliated walk-in clinic. At the time, Abney did not know that she was approximately 26 weeks pregnant.

Despite Abney complaining to hospital staff repeatedly about abdominal pains and Dewberry and others in the waiting area trying several times to get her help, the couple waited for more than 6 hours before deciding to go to another facility for help. When asked by hospital staff if she could be pregnant she indicated she could be.

The would-be parents then left and went to Valley Hospital which is close by. After explaining the situation at UMC and her condition to Valley staff, they allege they were treated even more rudely and told she could wait just as long at Valley.

Based on the attitude of the staff at Valley the couple did not think they would get the necessary help so they eventually left. After purchasing some pain medication at a local store they went home. Less than 30 minutes after arriving at home Abney gave birth to a baby girl who passed away.

The basis of the medical malpractice lawsuit is that the two hospitals failed to properly test Abney based on her symptoms. It also alleges that they violated federal law, namely the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act. The suit is also asking for damages for the emotional distress suffered by both parents.

Representatives from UMC hospital refused to comment on the lawsuit but have taken steps to terminate 6 employees in the wake of the incident. A representative from Valley issued a statement "categorically [denying] the allegations..”

The lawsuit comes as patients-rights groups complain that waiting times at hospital emergency rooms are at an all-time high and hospitals complain they are straddled by uninsured patients and cuts in funding.

Check back for updates to this case as it develops.

Judge Tosses Lawsuit over Baby Breastfeeding Mixup

Most often, when a family hires an Orlando Medical Malpractice Attorney to file a medical malpractice lawsuit or an Orlando Birth Injury Lawyer to file a birth injury lawsuit, it relates to a significant medical mistake.

Your Orlando medical malpractice lawyer is available to help if you or a family member has suffered injury, death or a severe birth injury as a result of a medical mistake by a doctor or hospital staff. This often comes in the form of surgical error, failure to diagnose a disease or medical negligence.

Many people think, however, that you can file a medical malpractice or birth injury lawsuit if there is any type of mistake or wrongdoing on the part of the doctor or hospital staff.

Unfortunately, there are some cases that your Orlando birth injury attorney can’t help you with. In order to prevail in a lawsuit, you, your family or your infant need to have suffered a real injury.

This was highlighted in a recent case in New York where a woman tried to file a medical malpractice lawsuit against a hospital that accidentally gave her newborn infant to the wrong mother.

While cases of switched infants are well known and can be traumatic on the families involved, they do occur and almost always are remedied in a short amount of time before any damage takes place.

In this case, the infant mix up resulted in the newborn being given to the wrong mother for her first breastfeeding, however no other damage occurred. A court ruled that this was not enough to prove damages.

The case started when Lydia Williams of Brooklyn, NY filed a medical malpractice lawsuit against Long Island College Hospital. Her and her husband are claiming mental distress and emotional disturbance after a nurse briefly gave their daughter to the wrong mother by accident after her 2008 birth

The surrogate mother gave the child its’ first breastfeeding, but the true mother and child were quickly reunited. The mother, however, is incensed that the hospital didn’t offer enough apology and couldn’t prove that the other mother was disease-free due to patient privacy restrictions.

A judge with the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division court threw out the case, ruling that the woman and her husband did not show any true injury as a result of the mix up.

The woman and her husband, however, still infuriated over the mistake and wanting compensation, have vowed to appeal the decision.

Hospital Settles Medical Malpractice Lawsuit Over Improper Treatment of Homeless Woman

People in Florida who have been affected by negligence or a medical mistake at a hospital usually call an Orlando Medical Malpractice Attorney or Orlando Birth Injury Lawyer to file a medical malpractice lawsuit or birth injury lawsuit against those responsible for the mistakes inside the facility.

A lawsuit that was recently settled in Los Angeles, California, however, dealt with allegations of how a hospital treated a patient outside of their facility after they allegedly failed to follow discharge protocol.

The suit, which was filed by the Los Angeles city attorney, alleged mistreatment after a hospital supposedly dumped a patient at a homeless shelter without properly stabilizing her condition. A settlement was announced this week for $125,000.

While the settlement will not compensate the victim for the alleged medical negligence of the hospital, fortunately it should police against similar instances occurring in the future and help homeless shelters in the area shoulder their burden.

The case, which resembles a medical malpractice lawsuit, started four years ago when staff from the Centinela Freeman Regional Medical Center in Inglewood, CA discharged an elderly woman by taking her to a homeless shelter.

The woman, who was in her 60s, suffered from chronic lung problems and was found by authorities on the street carrying an oxygen container. City authorities charge that she was taken to a temporary winter shelter at a National Guard Armory without following proper discharge procedures.

Since this highly publicized instance, the city has uncovered hundreds of similar situations where patients are dumped back onto the streets by hospital staff. One hospital alone was found to have dumped 150 patients. The city has filed suit against other hospital groups as well for the same acts.

Experts predict that the practice occurs thousands of times per year across the country due to rising medical costs, uninsured patients and the wish of hospitals to free up space for patients with insurance.

As part of the settlement with the city, Centinela Freeman will pay $120,000 to a local charity that helps mentally ill homeless patients, as well as $5,000 in civil penalties to the city.

The hospital group has also agreed to an injunction which prohibits the discharge of patients in a certain area of South Los Angeles in the future. The hospital, however, admitted no wrong in the agreement and many fear that the practice will continue in other areas.

Family Files Medical Malpractice Wrongful Death Lawsuit over Hospital Death

Victims of medical malpractice in Orlando usually call on an Orlando medical malpractice lawyer, Orlando wrongful death lawyer or Orlando birth injury lawyer in the most dire of times to file a medical malpractice lawsuit or birth injury lawsuit after they have been seriously injured or have dealt with the death of a family member.

Often medical injury or wrongful death occurs at a hospital due to the mistake or negligence of doctors, nurses or other medical staff. This can be due to surgical error, failure to stabilize or treat a patient properly, negligence during delivery causing birth injury, or failure to properly diagnose a serious injury.

Many recent cases have dealt with the accidental but wrongful death of patients due to the administration of improper medication or the wrong amount of medication. These tragic accidents are entirely preventable and can only be stopped by creating increased awareness to hospital mistakes.

A similar case recently filed in Boston dealt with the unfortunate but avoidable death of a 76 year old mother that was caused when the doctors and nurses at a hospital gave her an overdose of a blood thinning drug.

The medical malpractice lawsuit and wrongful death lawsuit were filed by the family of Geraldine Oswald against Boston’s Massachusetts General Hospital and several of its doctors and nurses after her death in November 2010.

According to the lawsuit, Oswald was admitted to Mass General last November after she broke her shoulder earlier in the year and developed an infection. Reports indicate that hospital staff gave her too much of a blood thinning drug, which led to her death.

The lawsuit further alleges that the drug overdose caused Oswald to hemorrhage for 12 full hours while she was in the intensive care unit before passing away. The family is distraught over the possibility that their mother suffered for so long with no action taken by hospital staff.

Following Oswald’s death, the hospital admitted that mistakes were made that caused her death and that they had undertaken an extensive internal review to learn from the case and protect from similar instances happening in the future.

The hospital has also apologized to the family for the death of their mother which they stated was preventable. Family members, however, say that this isn’t enough to bring back their mother, and that only the penalty of a lawsuit can help ensure that this type of mistake doesn’t happen to others.

Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Filed Against Hospitals for Radiation

Orlando Medical Malpractice Attorneys and Orlando Birth Injury Lawyers often help victims and families of those injured by medical mistakes file a medical malpractice lawsuit or birth injury lawsuit.

Medical malpractice and birth injury lawsuits are often filed when a patient is injured or dies as the result of a medical mistake, failure to diagnose a disease or surgical error made by doctors, nurses or hospital staff, or when medical negligence during delivery results in birth injury like cerebral palsy.

A recent medical malpractice lawsuit filed in West Virginia, however, centers around allegations that patients were over-radiated while undergoing CT scans although a hospital was warned about the radiation levels.

The lawsuits have been filed by nearly 100 former patients against Cabell Huntington Hospital in West Virginia. These suits join those recently filed against several other hospitals across the country including hospitals across California and in Alabama.

These lawsuits allege that the patients received greater than healthy exposure amounts to radiation from CT scans from October 9, 2009 through November 23 of 2010.

More shocking is that documents suggest the exposures happened after warnings by the Food and Drug Administration about the risks and even after the hospital may have known that some dangerous exposures already occurred.

In September of 2009, following an extensive investigation of several hundred prior cases of CT scan radiation due to overexposure, the Food and Drug Administration issued a report cautioning against the practice. However, the lawsuit alleges patients at Cabell received radiation overdose even after the report was issued.

The lawsuits and some government documents also suggest that administrators at the hospital for months had complete knowledge that many of the overdoses had taken place, but did not disclose the fact to the public until confronted by a story by The New York Times.

Medical Malpractice Lawsuit Filed for Birth Injury over Early Discharge

Orlando medical malpractice lawyers and Orlando birth injury attorneys are following a medical malpractice birth injury lawsuit recently filed in Eastern Texas by a mother who was released early from a hospital and subsequently gave birth to a child with a birth injury.

Orlando medical malpractice attorneys and birth injury lawyers often represent people and families injured as a result of medical mistakes, negligent treatment, failure to diagnose disease and surgical error. They also help families whose infants have been injured due to negligent decisions by the doctor during delivery.

In this birth injury lawsuit, which was filed last week in Federal Court in the Eastern District of Texas, Wendy Cherry sued McKinney Medical Center for injuries that her daughter Emma suffered during birth after she was sent home and left to deliver on her own.

Mrs. Cherry originally presented to the emergency room at McKinney on February 4 in apparent labor. At that time she complained of severe and sudden pain in her pelvis and asked to be treated.

However, Cherry was discharged by hospital staff before she was stabilized and without having undergone a comprehensive medical screening examination.

Later that day after being released, Cherry went into labor at home and gave birth to her daughter Emma. However, she underwent a delayed delivery and, without the aid of trained medical staff or equipment available at a hospital, she alleges that her daughter was injured as a result of the delayed delivery.

The medical malpractice birth injury lawsuit filed by Cherry does not elaborate as to what type of injury her daughter suffered or the severity of the condition. Some common birth injuries are cerebral palsy, Erb’s palsy, fractured extremities, brain damage, brachial plexus and partial paralysis.

The complaint does, however, allege that if Cherry would not have been released from the hospital so early, her daughter could have avoided the injuries that she sustained since medical staff could have helped in the delivery and medical equipment would have been available.

In the lawsuit, Mrs. Cherry asked for an award for the medical expenses incurred so far and in the future for her daughter’s injury, as well as pain, suffering and mental anguish suffered due to the medical malpractice.

The Cherry family and their medical malpractice attorney have also requested that the case be heard in front of a jury.

Representatives of the hospital could not be reached for comment prior to publication of this story. Check back for further updates as they develop.

Hospitals Look to Limit Medical Malpractice Liability for Bad Doctors

Orlando Medical Malpractice Attorneys are keeping an eye on legislation that is being proposed in Utah that could start a trend affecting your right to file a medical malpractice lawsuit or birth injury lawsuit here in Florida.

Orlando birth injury lawyers and medical malpractice attorneys often represent those who have been injured or families of infants and those who die as the result of negligence by medical professionals at hospitals. Even though these mistakes are often the fault of doctors and hospital staff, part of the liability falls on the hospital that contracted them.

The rights of victims of birth injury and medical malpractice in Florida has already been severely limited by the efforts of health care lobbyists to limit the damages available and increase the costs of successfully pursuing a medical malpractice lawsuit.

Now, a bill being debated in the state legislature of Utah would further limit the rights of medical injury victims and could spread to Florida in the future if adopted. The proposal, senate bill 150, would make it harder for those harmed by the actions of doctors who are under the influence of drugs or alcohol to hold the hospital liable.

Under normal circumstances, an employer is liable to customers for the actions of their employees if they are acting within their work duties at the time they cause harm to another. This is especially true if they are under the influence.

Hospitals, however, who enjoy fierce backing by lobbyists, have over the years sought to evade their responsibilities by using doctors as independent contractors rather than paid employees of the facility. In many cases it has worked to limit the liability of the hospitals when people are injured in their care.

In theory, the liability shrugged off by hospitals would fall on the doctors and their liability carriers. However, many physicians today operate without medical malpractice liability insurance by having patients execute a release before they receive treatment, and hiding assets in case they are sued personally.

This means that the ability of victims to recover for damages due to injuries they suffer at the hands of negligent doctors can be almost cut out completely. This is fine for politicians and health care executives arguing about tort reform and rising medical costs, but not for victims of negligent care left with lifelong injuries or death.

At the present hospitals are required by law to investigate the medical background and qualifications of physicians before approving them to practice in their facility. This process protects both the patients and the liability to the hospitals.

By limiting the liability of hospitals who employ reckless doctors, the motivation to properly qualify a doctor before allowing them to practice is reduced as well. This could lead to even higher medical and litigation costs as well as lower safety standards for the residents of Florida.

Hospitals Look to Limit Medical Malpractice Liability for Bad Doctors

Orlando Medical Malpractice Attorneys are keeping an eye on legislation that is being proposed in Utah that could start a trend affecting your right to file a medical malpractice lawsuit or birth injury lawsuit here in Florida.

Orlando birth injury lawyers and medical malpractice attorneys often represent those who have been injured or families of infants and those who die as the result of negligence by medical professionals at hospitals. Even though these mistakes are often the fault of doctors and hospital staff, part of the liability falls on the hospital that contracted them.

The rights of victims of birth injury and medical malpractice in Florida has already been severely limited by the efforts of health care lobbyists to limit the damages available and increase the costs of successfully pursuing a medical malpractice lawsuit.

Now, a bill being debated in the state legislature of Utah would further limit the rights of medical injury victims and could spread to Florida in the future if adopted. The proposal, senate bill 150, would make it harder for those harmed by the actions of doctors who are under the influence of drugs or alcohol to hold the hospital liable.

Under normal circumstances, an employer is liable to customers for the actions of their employees if they are acting within their work duties at the time they cause harm to another. This is especially true if they are under the influence.

Hospitals, however, who enjoy fierce backing by lobbyists, have over the years sought to evade their responsibilities by using doctors as independent contractors rather than paid employees of the facility. In many cases it has worked to limit the liability of the hospitals when people are injured in their care.

In theory, the liability shrugged off by hospitals would fall on the doctors and their liability carriers. However, many physicians today operate without medical malpractice liability insurance by having patients execute a release before they receive treatment, and hiding assets in case they are sued personally.

This means that the ability of victims to recover for damages due to injuries they suffer at the hands of negligent doctors can be almost cut out completely. This is fine for politicians and health care executives arguing about tort reform and rising medical costs, but not for victims of negligent care left with lifelong injuries or death.

At the present hospitals are required by law to investigate the medical background and qualifications of physicians before approving them to practice in their facility. This process protects both the patients and the liability to the hospitals.

By limiting the liability of hospitals who employ reckless doctors, the motivation to properly qualify a doctor before allowing them to practice is reduced as well. This could lead to even higher medical and litigation costs as well as lower safety standards for the residents of Florida.

Parents File Medical Malpractice Lawsuit Over Hospital Delay

Orlando medical malpractice attorneys are following a medical malpractice lawsuit filed recently in California since it addresses an alarming recent trend in hospitals across the country and could have implications for medical malpractice lawsuits filed in Orlando and Central Florida.

Medical malpractice attorneys all over Florida have seen increased complaints about patients whose injury or illness worsens while they are waiting for hours in crowded waiting rooms and being refused treatment.

While it would be reasonable to believe that a hospital is liable for your injury or illness getting worse while waiting for treatment in their facility, this often isn’t the case. This is because the problem is so common across most hospitals in the country.

Many doctors will tell you off the record that if you require any significant treatment, it is safer to try to have it performed in an outpatient facility, doctors office or special surgical center rather than in a hospital due to reduced risks of infection.

However, if you do contract an infection due to treatment at a hospital, contact an Orlando Medical Malpractice Attorney to discuss your legal options.

The recent lawsuit in California was filed by Ryan Jeffers and Leah Vang, the parents of a 2 year old girl who was taken to Methodist Hospital in Sacramento for treatment of a bacterial infection that was causing her persistent fever, discoloring of her skin and weakness.

The girl, Malyia, and her parents then waited for approximately five hours while her condition worsened. They begged doctors and nurses in the ER to treat the girl but nothing was done.

Eventually Jeffers broke into another office and demanded treatment for his daughter. By that time, however, the bacteria had severely affected a large part of Malyia’s body.

She was flown to Stanford University’s Children’s Hospital for treatment of a Strept A infection, but doctors had to amputate part of each limb from the damage. Malyia’s feet, left hand and part of her right hand were amputated.

Malyia will now require significant intensive rehabilitation to learn to function as she grows up. The future medical costs that she and her parents will face for her treatment are unquantifiable at this point.

The medical malpractice lawsuit filed by her parents against the hospital and several medical workers demands an unknown amount. The suit alleges that the hospital "chose to negligently staff, operate and supervise the emergency room" which resulted in their daughters injuries and resulting need for extensive surgery and treatment.

Representatives from Methodist Hospital commented that the thoughts and prayers of the company and their staff were with the girl but that they could not comment on pending litigation.

Woman Files Medical Malpractice Lawsuit over Nerve Damage Birth Injury

Medical malpractice lawyers and birth injury attorneys in Florida usually file birth injury lawsuits when an infant suffers an injury resulting in a condition such as cerebral palsy due to the mistake of a hospital of medical staff.

A medical malpractice birth injury lawsuit recently filed in Wyoming, however, alleges that a mother suffered a birth injury of her own resulting in nerve damage due to the medical mistakes of a hospital nurse during her birth.

The lawsuit, which was filed recently in Campbell County, WY, against Campbell County Memorial Hospital, Northern Plains Anesthesia Associates, and staff, alleges that the improper administration of anesthesia shots by a nurse has caused significant injury and harm to Jaime Williams and her husband.

According to the lawsuit, Williams presented to the hospital in September of 2008 in near labor, and doctors decided to induce her delivery. She was given a series of three injections, each one causing excruciating pain worse than the last. The injections also caused immediate numbness in her leg.

Eventually, doctors performed a C-section to remove her baby, which was born healthy. Williams, however, still suffers from persistent pain in her back and leg, even though she has undergone several surgeries to try to correct the problem. Her husband also claims the injury has caused him loss of comfort, care and consortium.

The couple are suing the hospital, anesthesiology group and staff for $4.5 million for their total damages.

Representatives from the hospital have not commented on the pending litigation.

Family Files Birth Injury Lawsuit over Medical Malpractice at Florida Hospital

Orlando birth injury lawyers and Orlando medical malpractice attorneys are following a medical malpractice lawsuit filed recently in the Central Florida town of Bartow just outside of Orlando.

The lawsuit alleges that the negligence and medical mistakes by a hospital and certain medical staff during the birth of a girl five years ago led to her birth injuries and current problems.

The lawsuit was filed against Lakeland Regional Medical Center, Central Florida Health Care and two nurse practitioners who work at the facility. Fiona and Stanley Brown filed the case on behalf of their five year old daughter Destiny, who was born at LRMC in September of 2005.

In suit filed this week, the Browns allege that medical mistakes made by the defendants caused Destiny’s cerebral palsy and the seizures that she still has to this day.

Mrs. Brown had been receiving prenatal care at Lakeland OB-GYN, who they allege is operated by Central Florida Health Care. Central Florida Health Care denies affiliation with Lakeland OB-GYN during that time.

Regardless, during a visit on September 28, 2005, Brown allegedly exhibited signs of hypertension and was sent to LRMC for evaluation. When she arrived at LRMC testing showed a drop in the heart rate of the fetus and Brown was told she needed an emergency C-section.

Unfortunately, Brown gave birth to her daughter by traditional vaginal birth before the emergency C-section could be performed and she suffered a birth injury that led to cerebral palsy as a result. The suit also charges that Destiny suffers constant seizures due to neurological disorders from her birth injuries.

In the lawsuit, the Brown’s medical malpractice attorney alleges that the hospital and nurses did not act quickly enough during her emergency, failed to give adequate treatment.

Central Florida Health Care is charged with failure to diagnose and identify Brown’s prenatal condition and the fetal distress, and failure to give proper warning of the conditions.

The birth injury lawyer also argues that the facilities are improperly withholding the medical records from his clients surrounding the incident.

LRMC has not given any comment regarding the pending lawsuit.

New Allegations in Florida Medical Malpractice Lawsuit

Additional details have emerged regarding the knowledge of a hospital that its’ standards of care may not have been sufficient and could have led to injury in a North Florida medical malpractice lawsuit that is currently in litigation.

Medical malpractice lawyers are representing a man who suffered several injuries during a hospital visit for bariatric surgery in 2007. Orlando birth injury attorneys and medical malpractice lawyers also represent families in birth injury lawsuits who have been affected with birth injuries and other injury from hospital errors.

In this medical malpractice lawsuit, attorneys representing Clay Chandler, a Clay County police officer, allege that poor standards of care at Memorial Hospital caused him severe personal injury. There are currently five lawsuits pending against the hospital filed in February 2010 for similar types of mistreatment.

Chandler was admitted to Memorial in 2007 for a weight reduction surgery but claims he suffered various complications resulting from improper care. He has alleged injuries ranging from bed sores to brain damage.

According to Chandler’s medical malpractice lawyer, sworn testimony from former nurses working in the hospital indicate that the hospital knew that there were problems in the standard of care but did little or nothing to correct it.

Testimony by a former nurse indicated that the hospital had been warned by the government in 2008 that they did not meet the minimum standards of care for certain procedures and subsequently agreed to make changes, but never did.

The nurse also testified that she had warned administrators of problems with patients not receiving adequate care, but was told that the issues were too large to remedy. She reportedly later resigned over frustration at the lack of action being taken to address the problems.

Representatives from Memorial Hospital have given little comment since the inception of the lawsuits, but did attack the decision of Chandler’s medical malpractice attorney to go public with the information uncovered in the lawsuit.

Family Files Medical Malpractice Lawsuit over Death of Woman in Back Surgery

Orlando Medical Malpractice Attorneys often represent families of victims of birth injury, surgical error or hospital mistake that leads to medical injury or wrongful death. In a similar suit in New York, a family is suing a hospital after a woman died following back surgery in 2009.

According to the wrongful death medical malpractice lawsuit filed this week, Cheryl McCoul died in February 2009 while undergoing a spinal fusion surgery to her low back at St. John’s Medical Center.

The lawsuit alleges that Dr. George Waterhouse committed surgical error when he cut a major vein during the surgery. After asking for help from his partner, Michael Rosenberg, the two tried to fix the ruptured vein but were unable. They then transferred McCoul to ICU and later to a facility in Utah without properly stabilizing her, the lawsuit charges.

When the doctors were unable to repair McCoul’s ruptured vein, her abdomen began filling with blood creating pressure on her vital organs. She eventually passed away from complications from these injuries

McCoul’s family, which includes her surviving husband, siblings, children and grandchildren, have filed a lawsuit against the hospital, the two doctors that performed the surgery, and their employer, St. John’s Surgical Group.

The lawsuit alleges that the surgeons were negligent in their treatment of McCoul for cutting the vein, failing to repair it and failing to properly stabilize her before transferring her to ICU and another facility. According to filings it was more than 9 hours after the vein was cut that she was finally taken to an alternative facility in Utah. By then, it was too late.

The initial damages sought by the family amount to $21 million, though this could change as the case develops. This amount represents the emotional distress, pain and suffering of her family, loss of life, loss of income and loss of care, comfort and companionship.

The doctors and hospital were contacted but had no comment for the story. Check back for updates.

Patient files Medical Malpractice Lawsuit over Infected Hospital Equipment

Orlando medical malpractice attorneys and Orlando birth injury lawyers usually file a medical malpractice lawsuit on behalf of clients when they have been the victim of a birth injury, surgical error, failure to diagnose or a hospital mistake.

However, they are following a new case recently filed in Oregon which deals with the use of infected machinery to see how the court decides.

Lawsuits against hospitals dealing with infections, though very common, are difficult to win because most hospital use the same low standards for infection control. Even though you hear about MRSA and other infections coming from hospitals every day, there is often little that patients can do from a legal standpoint.

In this case, a former patient of a hospital at St. Charles Health System filed a lawsuit last week after learning that the medical equipment used in her colonoscopy had not been disinfected by the hospital prior to use.

The unidentified young woman suffers from Crohn’s disease, for which doctors recommend regular colonoscopies. Crohns is a disease affecting the small intestine which can produce ulcers and polyps that result in pain, cramping and trouble with bowel movements.

The hospital admitted the mistake of not cleaning the machine in a letter they sent to the woman late last year. They also cautioned her that she may now be at risk for HIV, hepatitis and other viruses as a result.

St. Charles has offered to provide tests for these conditions at no charge but has not offered any other compensation for the woman’s situation.

Parents Intend to File Wrongful Death Medical Malpractice Lawsuit over Failure to Disclose Birth Injury

Medical malpractice Lawyers and birth injury attorneys are following a case that recently emerged in Michigan in which a young boy died tragically and unexpectedly from a treatable condition after a hospital and doctor failed to inform his family of that condition.

Lawyers in Florida usually file birth injury lawsuits for mistakes made during childbirth or file medical malpractice lawsuits for hospital mistakes, surgical errors or the failure to diagnose serious diseases. This case is an example of the latter.

10 year old Connor Burton was found by his family in April of 2009 after he apparently died in his sleep. An autopsy later revealed that he had Long QT Syndrome, which can be fatal if not properly treated.

Although the boy had undergone an EKG 3 years prior when he had his tonsils removed which showed the condition, the family’s lawyer claims the hospital and doctor which ordered and reviewed the test never told his family or regular treating physician.

The Burton family has since filed an intention to sue the hospital and doctor for the omission. According to their attorney the lawsuit will seek damages for the wrongful death of the boy from medical malpractice and negligence.

They will likely claim that the boys condition could have been easily treated if disclosed, saving his life. Long QT Syndrome can usually be treated with medication, surgery or implantation of a defibrillator. However, left untreated, the condition can be fatal.

Connor was described by his parents as kind, athletic, studious and very interested in reading.

The doctor and hospital have failed to comment on the pending medical malpractice wrongful death lawsuit, although representatives for the hospital did say they were keeping the family in their prayers.

Basketball Player Files Medical Malpractice Lawsuit over Amputation

Lawyers in North Dakota last week filed a medical malpractice lawsuit for a former college basketball player whose leg was amputated at a hospital during emergency treatment. Florida medical malpractice attorneys from Jacksonville to Orlando to Ft. Lauderdale file similar suits everyday for birth injury, hospital mistakes and surgical error.

More than 200,000 people per year die from medical-related mistakes. Many more are left with permanent injuries or disfigurement by the negligence of doctors, nurses and hospital staff.

In this case, Lenishka McDonald, from the Bahamas, suffered an injury to her knee in October of 2009 during a basketball game while playing for Williston State College. She was originally taken to Trinity Health Hospital in Minot where doctors found arterial damage behind her knee.

McDonald was later transferred to Mayo Clinic in Minnesota where her right leg was amputated below the knee. She is suing the hospital where she received emergency treatment alleging that they did not provide proper testing or care.

Among her damages are pain and suffering, the loss of her ability to play sports and future medical treatment for her amputation.

If you or a loved one have been the victim of medical malpractice or birth injury from the mistakes or negligence of a medical professional, call us today.

Widow Awarded $6 Million in Wrongful Death Medical Malpractice Case

Florida Medical Malpractice Lawyers from Jacksonville to Orlando to Fort Lauderdale represent victims and families every day for injuries from medical mistakes, birth injury, hospital errors and the failure to diagnose serious diseases. Sometimes unfortunately these cases turn into wrongful death lawsuits when injuries are severe enough to cause death.

Lawyers in New Jersey representing a widow in a medical malpractice wrongful death lawsuit last week secured a $6 million verdict for damages caused when the failure of staff at a rehabilitation facility to follow proper protocol resulted in the death of her husband.

62 year old George Shufflebotham was receiving post-stroke therapy at the St. Lawrence Rehabilitation Center in 2003 and was expected to make a significant recovery. Unfortunately, he was left unattended in a wheel chair and fell out suffering a brain hemorrhage.

Lawyers for his widow argued that the negligence in leaving him unattended when the left side of his body had become weakened from his stroke led to his fall and that the failure to institute proper care afterward led to his death.

After the fall, Shufflebotham was examined but doctors did not order a CAT scan, which could have revealed his injury. Nurses later noted that his pupils were dilating slowly, which can be a sign of hemorrhaging, but still failed to order emergency care. Instead, Shufflebotham was placed back in bed.

Shufflebotham was finally taken to the hospital the next day after staff noted he was sweating and vomiting, however by that time he was in advanced stages of a brain hemorrhage. After his brain stopped functioning he was placed on life support but eventually taken off by his family.

The lawsuit by his widow alleged medical malpractice and wrongful death due to the failure of the rehab facility to offer a safe environment and properly respond with adequate medical care once Shufflebotham was injured.

Medical Malpractice Lawsuit against Hospital Alleges Infections due to Cost Cutting

Florida Medical Malpractice Attorneys from Jacksonville to Orlando to Ft. Lauderdale typically represent families who have been affected by birth injury, surgical errors, medical mistakes or failure to diagnose serious diseases. However, there is a growing movement to try to hold hospitals accountable for injuries caused by infection.

Hospital infection lawsuits are usually very difficult to win because a hospital only needs to show that it followed acceptable standards of care in order to avoid liability in a medical malpractice lawsuit. In the case of infections, they affect every hospital, therefore it is difficult to show fault.

In a recent medical malpractice lawsuit in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, however, five women are suing Columbia St. Mary’s hospital for disabling infections they received during treatment. The group alleges that cost cutting measures by the hospital in order to help with construction of a new facility led to increased infection risks.

Columbia began construction of a $400 million facility on Lake Michigan in 2004. The lawsuit alleges that, in order to help with building costs, the hospital cut funding and several employees in its’ infection control department.

One of the women, Joan Sinclair, suffered a serious infection during a 2008 hip replacement surgery which almost killed her and left her unable to walk on her own. Although she used to work for Columbia St. Mary’s, she was terminated after her disabling infection which she claims the hospital caused.

Doctors have repeatedly warned patients of the dangers of infections from hospitals. Unfortunately, however, many states do not require hospitals to track and report the numbers of instances of MRSA and similar infections.

Currently, Florida is one of the states that require hospitals to report infection information to the public. Experts and medical malpractice attorneys believe the duty to report infections will pressure hospitals to take steps to curb those infections.

Federal Study Shows Medical Malpractice may be Worse than Thought

Medical malpractice attorneys and birth injury lawyers hope that their actions will lead to more safety awareness in hospitals, but a recent study shows that hospitals may be ignoring many guidelines of patient care.

With rampant talk of tort reform and limits on damages from politicians who receive millions from large healthcare donors, it is sometimes hard to remember why our justice system is set up to protect victims.

According to the results of a study released Tuesday by the Office of the Inspector General, the occurrence of medical errors at our country’s facilities may be worse than thought.

The study, conducted by the OIG division of the U.S. Health and Human Services Department, examined the medical records of 780 Medicare patients at random. It showed that over 14% of them suffered hospital injuries including falls, bedsores, infections, medication errors and other injuries during October of 2008.

Based on those numbers, the OIG estimated that as many as 1.6 million Medicare patients could be at risk of hospital injuries each year. This number doesn’t even include non-Medicare patients who receive care at hospitals. .

What’s more shocking, the OIG found that an injury caused by hospital error contributed to the death of a patient in 1.5 percent of cases. This would mean that approximately 180,000 Medicare patients nationally die each year due to injuries received in a hospital.

The OIG determined that 44 percent of the hospital injuries shown in the study were likely due to medical errors, substandard care and lack of patient monitoring and assessment, and therefore could have been prevented. They estimate the added treatment from these mistakes cost Medicare an additional $4.4 billion in 2009.

Medical malpractice experts reviewing the results of the study believe the number of patients being harmed in hospitals is far greater than the healthcare industry has been willing to admit.

Family Awarded $4.6 million for Mother’s Birth Injury Death

Orlando Birth Injury Attorneys as well as Orlando Medical Malpractice Attorneys and Wrongful Death Attorneys following a case of a mother’s tragic death after giving birth nearly three years ago are reporting that a jury has now awarded her family a substantial amount for the hospital’s error.

Florida malpractice lawyers regularly represent victims of surgical error, failure to diagnose, hospital mistakes and birth injury because of the states aging population, transient healthcare community and number of physicians trained out of country. In Minnesota, however, cases for wrongful death from medical malpractice are more rare.

This case centered around the death of Claudia Calcagno after she gave birth to her son on January 18, 2008 at New River Medical Center. Tragically, she developed a hemorrhage and bled to death just hours after delivery.

According to the lawsuit, she could have been saved by an emergency surgery, however doctors were unable to perform the procedure because the hospital did not have the necessary blood supply readily available. Her lawyer claimed the hospital had the necessary supplies in a refrigerator but did not make it available.

In a decision by the jury at trial, they awarded $4.6 million to Calcagno’s family for their past and future economic loss and the loss of her companionship.

The hospital argued in trial that Calcagno’s doctors were negligent for not performing the emergency surgery, which led to her death. Although they had previously been named in the suit for negligence, Calcagno’s attorney indicated evidence suggested they were not at fault. The jury found that neither doctor was negligent.

In a statement issued Friday, the hospital would not discuss their defense citing investigative confidentiality, but offered their condolences to the family and indicated they were considering an appeal of the decision.

Swedish Patient files Medical Malpractice Lawsuit after Surgical Burns

Orlando Medical Malpractice Lawyers this week learned of a new case filed in Omaha, Nebraska by attorneys representing a Swedish woman who was burned as a result of a surgical error involving a laser. Orlando Hospital Injury Attorneys represent clients for birth injury and surgical errors every day.

According to the lawsuit, Malgorzata Jakobsson of Sweden treated at the Nebraska Medical Center in 2009, where she underwent a procedure involving a high-frequency electrical current to treat for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome.

Thoracic Outlet Syndrome is a condition that restricts the blood vessels near the collarbone. The laser procedure uses current to destroy select tissue while supposedly leaving area tissue unaffected.

The lawsuit alleges that the woman awoke in pain and with burns on her face, neck, ear, back, shoulder and chest after a surgical fire broke out during the procedure. Her lawyer claims that since the procedure didn’t work, she had to undergo a second procedure and will now also need cosmetic surgery to help alleviate her scars.

The medical malpractice lawsuit charges that the hospital was negligent in following proper standards of care and protecting patients from injury. The suit claims that health care staff who performed the procedure knew of the dangers of fire and sparks from the equipment, but didn't take reasonable measures to prevent a fire.

Representatives from the hospital issued a statement indicating they had investigated the incident and were taking measures to ensure it didn’t happen again.

Family Awarded $20 Million for Medical Malpractice Surgical Error

According to Orlando Medical Malpractice Attorneys, surgical errors, failure to diagnose diseases and hospital mistakes are situations that happen everyday across Florida. These often result in birth injuries, personal injury or even death to the patient and leave families devastated. Those affected by medical malpractice do have some recourse available, however.

A family in Little Rock, Arkansas recently filed a medical malpractice lawsuit after a surgical error left their son with brain damage. Cody Metheny underwent surgery in 2004 to remove part of his brain tissue that doctors thought was causing him to have seizures.

In a surgical mistake, physicians accidently removed part of the brain matter from Metheny’s healthy side of his brain before they realized their mistake and proceeded to operate on the correct side. Although Cody lost some brain function as a result of the mistake, it is unclear to what extent.

Metheny’s parents filed the lawsuit based on the negligence of the hospital and its staff. After the evidence was presented at trial, it took a jury in Pulaski County only two hours to deliberate and reach a decision. They awarded the family $20 million for their damages.

The hospital has issued a statement offering their regret and condolences for the incident.

Family files Medical Malpractice Lawsuit over Mistaken Circumcision

Although Orlando Medical Malpractice Attorneys usually deal with cases involving failure to diagnose serious diseases, surgical error and birth injury, they are available to help clients with injuries or damage from any type of medical mistake. A recent case in South Florida shows how medical error can come in all forms.

Mario Viera was only 8 days old when doctors and nurses at South Miami Hospital performed a routine circumcision on him last month. His family, however, never gave permission for the procedure to be performed and is alleging the mistake has caused them and their son untold damages.

The hospital has apologized for the mistake and taken full responsibility. Representatives claim a consent form was misinterpreted. Mario’s mother, Vera Delgado, has filed both a medical malpractice lawsuit and criminal battery allegations with Miami police.

While the actions of the family may seem extreme to some, it is understandable that the mistake carries lifelong implications and touches on deep-routed religious and cultural practices. Although a majority of infants in the United States are still circumcised, the number has fallen over the past few decades as more and more families opt to not have their children circumcised. Anti-circumcision groups from around the world have gravitated to this case causing further controversy.

In a statement by representatives, the hospital claimed that the procedure was performed within medical standards and without any complication. They have also apologized for the mistake and indicated new steps will be taken in the future to ensure that a similar mistake doesn’t happen again.

Check back for further updates on this story.

Orlando-Based Adventist Hospital asking for reduction of medical malpractice award

Orlando medical malpractice attorneys and Orlando Birth Injury Lawyers often represent those who have been injured as a result of medical mistakes at hospitals or the failure of doctors or medical staff to follow protocol. Injuries and death are often caused by surgical errors, failure to diagnose a disease, or the failure of a doctor to react timely in a problematic childbirth.

However, even when attorneys are able to obtain a fair verdict for their clients or family of those injured, hospitals often ask the courts to reduce those awards. By tying a case up in litigation for as long as possible, the giant medical companies hope to force the injured party to settle for a lesser amount.

A recent case showing this serves as a reminder that you should seek an attorney who is committed to fighting your case, not just getting you a quick settlement. Contact the offices of Allen Murphy Law for answers to how to best fight your medical malpractice or birth injury case.

The case was originally filed in 2008 by Yesenia Rivera, who accused Adventist-owned Shady Grove Adventist Hospital of Montgomery, Alabama, as well as Drs. Dawn Thornton and Virendra Saxena of Montgomery Emergency Physicians LLC of failing to properly diagnose and treat her for a blockage in her urethra which was caused by kidney stones.

On August 9, 2010, a jury found that he hospital and doctors were liable and awarded Rivera $2.35 million for her damages.

According to court filings, Shady Grove and the two doctors are now asking the judge to reduce the award, arguing that it is excessive. If they do not prevail in the attempts with the judge, it is likely that they will appeal the decision to a higher court.

Parents file birth injury medical malpractice lawsuit after hospital gives newborn morphine

Medical malpractice attorneys in Santa Ana, California last week filed a birth injury lawsuit on behalf the parents of an infant who was accidentally administered morphine by an area hospital. Orlando medical malpractice attorneys often file lawsuits against hospitals for birth injury, surgical error and other hospital mistakes.

The suit is being filed by Todd and Jessica Blischke after they gave birth to triplets at Mission Viejo Hospital in April of 2009. Jessica was receiving pain treatment after a Caesarian section when Nurses and doctors apparently mixed up the IV lines between her and one of her infants. As a result their daughter Taylee was given morphine instead of her mother. Fortunately, the infant survived and was discharged in healthy condition.

State health officials have already fined Mission hospital $50,000 for the incident. Although the child survived it is too soon to tell if she will develop any long term problems as a result. The lawsuit was filed for damages surrounding the negligent treatment, which could include health problems down the road or medical costs.

The infants parents have now relocated to Seattle, however the lawsuit was filed in California court since that is where the incident took place. Check back for updates on this and other medical malpractice stories.

Death of 18 year old from Mesothelioma raises questions about latency period

An 18 year old Great Britain girl who became an inspiration to many after she developed mesothelioma at an early age sadly passed away last week. Aside from the grief of those supporting her fight against the disease, her death at such a young age raises new questions about the perceived latency period of diseases from asbestos exposure.

Sophie Ellis was only 13 years old when doctors first diagnosed her with mesothelioma. Experts are still not sure how she contracted the condition, which has been shown to be caused by exposure to asbestos. Because of the environments that usually bring victims in contact with the substance, Mesothelioma usually affects people in their 40s or older who have worked in certain high risk industries.

Doctors are now seeing more cases develop from secondary exposure, such as contact with clothes from family members who work near asbestos. Some believe this could have been a cause of Ellis disease. At the time she was diagnosed, she was given only months to live. Instead, she bravely fought the terminal disease for 5 years.

Ellis kept up her dream of becoming a musician or actress, even after having to undergo surgery to remove a lung and losing the use of her legs. She eventually was forced to stop college studies due to her treatment.

What baffles experts is that mesothelioma usually takes 15 to 40 years to develop. However, Ellis case is a rare exception. In Great Britain, which has the highest mesothelioma death rate in the world, only 9 people under the age of nineteen have died from the disease in the past 40 years.

Widow files medical malpractice lawsuit over comedians wrongful death

Lawyers representing the widow of deceased comedian Bernie Mac this week filed a medical malpractice lawsuit against his doctor alleging that the lack of proper treatment by the physician led to the actors untimely death. Orlando medical malpractice attorneys often file lawsuits on behalf of people who are injured or die as a result of medical mistakes or improper diagnoses.

Macs widow Rhonda McCullough filed the lawsuit against dermatologist Rene Earles alleging that the doctor did not refer her husband to the hospital in a timely manner when he presented to his office with symptoms weeks before his death. She charges that the resulting delay in treatment caused more severe health problems.

Mac passed away on August 9, 2008 from complications resulting from pneumonia.

Earles had been treating Mac for skin irritations on his head, face and neck caused by his inflammatory lung disease. After the usual treatment, he allowed Mac to sleep in the examination room for a couple of hours when he complained of exhaustion and weakness. He claims that had he known Mac was suffering from pneumonia, he would have sent him directly to the hospital. However, Mac wasnt diagnosed with pneumonia in both lungs until later.

McCulloughs lawsuit charges that the doctor did not identify Macs cardiopulmonary instability and further failed to take action when he exhibited abnormal vital signs. This, she alleges, caused more serious health problems and ultimately lead to the actors death at the age of 50.

Florida Nurse files Medical Malpractice Case Against Her Own Hospital

Jacksonville Medical Malpractice Attorneys are offering their support to a woman who developed Sepsis after an area hospital failed to properly diagnose her. Lawyers expect to file a medical malpractice lawsuit in the near future for the mother of two, who is also a nurse. The ironic twist is that the hospital that may have misdiagnosed her condition was the one where she worked. Orlando Medical Malpractice and birth injury lawyers often represent clients who have been damaged by hospital mistakes.

Jean Law worked for more than twenty years as a nurse at Baptist Medical Center South taking care of patients. Now, afflicted by the Sepsis she was diagnosed with in February, she is left unable to perform many of the basic functions of life. The disease, which can prove fatal in some cases, has left her without her legs or fingers.

As a result, Law must be attended to on a constant basis and cannot help her children they way she used to. The disease acts by flooding the bloodstream with bacteria.

Law first visited the emergency room at Baptist South when she felt symptoms from the disease, but was told she was ok and was sent home. At the time, she says she felt too sick to question the doctors decisions. The disease spread quickly afterward, but she feels it could have been avoided had she been properly diagnosed to start with.

As her doctors race to save the rest of her body from infection so she doesnt lose any more function, lawyers are stepping in to charge the hospital with medical mistake for not properly diagnosing her.

Medical Malpractice and Wrongful death lawsuit filed after patient falls off of pre-op table

Attorneys in Minnesota representing the family of a man who died earlier this year after a pre-operative mishap filed a lawsuit against the hospital they feel is responsible. Medical malpractice attorneys and wrongful death attorneys in Orlando and Melbourne often represent clients whose family members have been injured, died or suffered birth injury from hospital mistakes.

According to the lawsuit, 61 year old Max DeVries fell off of an operating table while undergoing a pre-operative procedure on March 8 at St. Josephs Hospital. At 330 pounds, the hospital did not have adequate equipment to handle a patient of his size, the suit alleges. He had been in the facility since February 12 after suffering a stroke and had undergone several surgeries already.

DeVries landed on his head from the fall, which was especially critical since an earlier surgery had removed part of his skull. He went into a coma three days after his fall and did not regain consciousness. He eventually passed away on April 13 after he was taken off of life support.

The lawsuit alleges that improper care and handling on the part of the hospital led to Devries fall and eventual death. The hospital issued a statement with their condolences for the family but could not comment on the investigation or pending lawsuit.

Wife files Medical Malpractice Lawsuit against Nursing Home for husbands death

Medical Malpractice attorneys and wrongful death lawyers in North Carolina this week began a trial in a lawsuit filed on behalf of the widow of a man who died while admitted to a nursing home. Lawyers in Orlando, Florida represent clients for similar cases as well as for birth injury at area hospitals.

The lawsuit was filed by Jadwiga Orlowski following the death of her husband, Marian, on July 16, 2008, from pneumonia. The former Nobel prize nominee, distinguished professor and drug researcher was 86 at the time of his death.

Orlowski was taken to Britthaven at Chapel Hill following surgery at a UNC hospital. According to the lawsuit, he was found on the floor of his room later the same day he was admitted after falling and suffering serious personal injury.

The lawsuit alleges that the nursing home was negligent in failing to watch Orlowski or provide him with a bed that had side rails since he suffered from dementia.

Although the nursing home has refused to comment on the pending suit, their response to the lawsuit argues that they did not know and had no reason to know of Orlowskis condition and treated him with reasonable care and diligence."

Britthaven operates 43 nursing homes in the outheast. The Chapel Hill facility has been placed under "special focus" by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for a pattern of substandard care.

Woman Files Medical Malpractice Lawsuit for Hospitals Failure to Sterilize

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Orlando and other parts of Florida often file lawsuits on behalf of their clients for mistakes in hospitals such as surgical errors, mistaken diagnoses, and birth injury. They have also encountered cases where patients were injured by a hospitals failure to properly clean its instruments. A similar case recently arose in Georgia.

A former patient of the VA Hospital in Augusta, Georgia has filed a lawsuit alleging that she contracted hepatitis C due to the hospitals use of a testing device that was not cleaned properly. Her suit asks for damages in the amount of $10 million.

Approximately 10,000 patients from veterans hospitals in Georgia, Florida and Tennessee were informed last year that they face a risk of contracting such infections due to exposure from medical instruments and equipment that was not sterilized properly.

Judy Yarzebinski alleges in her suit that she underwent a laryngoscopy in September of 2008 to reveal a risk of vocal cord paralysis. She was notified with others afterward that she may have been exposed to infections during the procedure.

Yarzebinski tested positive for hepatitis C in February 2009. Unfortunately, she has a blood condition that prevents her from being treated for the disease.

The Veterans Administration has denied that hospital instruments or equipment were improperly cleaned or that any of the staff were negligent in this case.

Woman files medical malpractice lawsuit after she becomes pregnant

Orlando medical malpractice attorneys typically file lawsuits on behalf of their clients around Florida for injuries or death resulting from medical negligence or mistakes. They also represent those affected by birth injury. However, a recent lawsuit filed in Texas is alleging a unique kind of injury.

A woman from Beaumont, Texas filed a lawsuit this week alleging medical malpractice on the behalf of the doctors and hospital that performed that performed her tubal ligation. She somehow became pregnant despite undergoing the procedure.

Rekenya Allen filed the suit against surgeon Dr. William N. Hawkins and Memorial Herman Baptist Hospital-Beaumont alleging that their negligence led to the ineffectiveness of her tubal ligation.

The suit alleges that she suffered injury both mentally and physically. It is unclear whether she chose to proceed with the pregnancy or undergo an abortion.

The lawsuit charges that Ms. Allen "suffered severe physical impairment and disfigurement," and that "said injuries have had a serious effect on plaintiff's health and well-being. Some of these effects are permanent and will abide with plaintiff for a long time, if not for plaintiff's entire life."

Hospital and Doctors sued for medical malpractice death of patient

Although recent headlines suggest medical malpractice claims have led to excessive testing in emergency rooms, patients continue to die and birth injury is prevalent in Orlando, Florida and elsewhere due to medical mistakes, failure to properly diagnose disease and the failure to perform procedures in a timely manner.

In a case recently filed by medical malpractice lawyers in Glenview, Illinois, the family of a man who died after a fluid overload from an infection is suing the hospital and doctors they say are responsible for his death.

The lawsuit alleges that last December, 56 year old David Timson presented to Glenbrook Hospital after he developed an infection in his hip. He underwent surgery for the infection but later suffered from failure of his kidneys. Because of his kidney failure it was necessary for Timson to undergo dialysis.

The suit alleges that while Timson was supposed to be undergoing dialysis, fluids began to build up in his body because doctors were not properly monitoring him after he went without dialysis treatments for several days. By giving him blood without dialysis, the family alleges, his body continued to fill with fluids which eventually led to cardiac arrest.

Timson was pronounced dead on January 2, 2010. An autopsy later showed that he died of a fluid overload.

Man files Medical Malpractice Suit over Wire Left in Chest

Medical malpractice attorneys in Oregon this week filed a lawsuit against a doctor and hospital on behalf of a man who claims a piece of medical equipment was left in his chest after a 2007 surgery. Lawyers in Jacksonville, Orlando and Ft. Lauderdale file similar suits for their clients everyday based on medical mistakes that cause birth injury, patient injury or wrongful death.

Ben Sebastiani, 76, is suing Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center claiming a piece of wire almost a foot long was mistakenly left in his chest after he underwent heart surgery in December, 2007.

He has also named his heart surgeon, Dr. Mark Taylor, as well as his assistant Charla LeAnn Pickett as defendants in the case. Sebastiani originally sought medical help after an abscess appeared on his torso and wouldnt go away. He claims he didnt know the wire was there until a year after the heart operation.

His lawsuit is asking for $20,000 in economic damages and $250,000 for pain and suffering, in addition to his legal fees.

Two Women file Birth Injury Lawsuits Against Hospital for Medical Malpractice

A lawyer representing two different women in Port Huron, Michigan is suing the same hospital for medical malpractice after both women experienced tragic ends to their childbirth. Attorneys in Florida also often file lawsuits on behalf of injured people for birth injury and medical malpractice.

According to a lawyer representing the women, both came to Port Huron Hospital eight years ago in labor but were made to wait for several hours. As a result, both of them suffered a placental abdruption, or the placenta peeling away from the uterus.

Both children were born with severe brain damage and cerebral palsy. One of them later passed away while the other is left with mental retardation and confined to a wheelchair. children died from the event while the other was left

The women are suing the doctor who was on call that evening, Dr. Jeanie Rowe, for allegedly refusing to report to the hospital and making them wait. They are also suing the hospital for negligence in failing to perform an emergency c-section on time.

As a result of the delay they claim both infants were injured from a lack of oxygen and blood supply.

Representatives for the hospital and doctor refused to comment on the matter.

Hospital sued for medical malpractice after botched robotic surgery

Medical Malpractice Attorneys representing a woman who was the victim of a robotical surgical error in a New Hampshire hospital filed a lawsuit this week to recover her damages. Lawyers in Florida routinely represent people for similar matters resulting in medical or birth injury.

The lawsuit centers around a procedure performed by surgeons using a remote-controlled robot called a da Vinci robot which is intended to make surgeries less invasive with less blood loss and quicker recovery times. However, several suits around the country have raised concerns that hospitals are allowing doctors to perform surgeries with the machine before they are fully experienced.

The suit was filed against Wentworth-Douglass Hospital this week by Sherry Long, 47, or New Hampshire. She claims that both of her ureters were cut while undergoing a hysterectomy with the robot on March 2, 2009. The lawsuit charges that the injury was due to the surgeons' lack of training on the robot.

Doctors who use the machine on a regular basis maintain it takes hundreds of surgeries to master it. Although some facilities have extensive robotic-training programs, others let their doctors use the complex machine unsupervised after just a few cases. The compsny who sells the robot offers a two-day training course, however further training is done at the discretion of the hospitals.

Other cases have been filed alleging injury due to operation of the da Vinci robot by insufficiently-trained surgeons. One was filed last summer in Boca Raton, Florida after a patient died from a surgery in which the doctor had never performed the surgery he was attempting with the robot before.

Wrongful Death Medical Malpractice Lawsuit set to Begin Today

Florida Medical Malpractice and Birth Injury lawyers routinely represent people who are injured or have lost a relative due to mistakes and negligence by doctors, hospitals or staff. A case recently filed in Wyoming that is starting trial this week shows the importance of retaining a qualified lawyer for your case.

Rebecca Prestrud filed the suit against a surgeon, Dr. Heidi Jost and Teton Orthopedics alleging that her husband’s April 2006 death was caused by medical mistakes and negligence of the professionals during surgery for a leg fracture in 2005.

She had also originally named a home health car company and hospital as defendants, however they were dismissed from the lawsuit after Prestrud failed to respond to a motion.

Prestrud’s lawsuit is based on a ruling from a coroner indicating her husband’s death was caused by a blood clot that formed in a leg or pelvic vein and then blocked an artery in a lung.

After Dr. Jost performed surgery on Kristoffer Prestrud, he stayed at St. John’s Hospital for 10 days where he was given medications and a compression boot to prevent blood clotting in his leg. Months later, he started feeling uncomfortable and experienced shortness of breath. He was attended to by a home health care nurse who failed to diagnose a blood clot and passed away days later.

In our opinion, the parties who Prestrud could have recovered against, the Home Healthcare company and hospital, were dismissed from the case based on the failure to secure adequate representation. It is unlikely she will prevail at trial against the surgeon or orthopedic group.

War Veteran files hospital medical malpractice lawsuit for vision loss

Medical malpractice lawyers in Florida and elsewhere usually counsel clients about medical malpractice cases involving surgical error or birth injury. A recent California case is unique, however, in that it involves an 87-year-old war veteran who is suing a veterans hospital for allegedly causing his blindness.

Lawyers representing David Woodward Sr. filed the lawsuit on March 25 against the U.S. government alleging that Palo Alto Veterans Hospital caused his legal blindness by failing to treat his glaucoma for over four years.

The hospital has admitted that it’s actions may have caused Woodward’s condition. In fact, the facility sent letters to 8 patients in February 2009 stating that an internal review revealed that improper care at the may have resulted in their vision loss.

The hospital previously suspended its chief of optometry after a review showed he and his staff were not following policy which required that they refer glaucoma patients to outside physicians for treatment. The doctor has since retired.

Woodward was treated in the hospital's vision department in 2004 and, according to the lawsuit, his file notes that staff suspected he was suffering from glaucoma. However, in subsequent visits over the next four and a half years, he was not treated for the condition.

Woodward is now legally blind, having lost more than 90 percent of his vision.

Doctor and Hospital sued again for medical malpractice in wrongful death case

Wrongful death lawyers representing the widow of an Army veteran have filed a lawsuit against embattled Dr. Daniel Brookoff and HealthOne, St. Luke's/Presbyterian Hospital in Colorado. Lawyers in Florida also represent clients in birth injury and medical malpractice cases against hospitals and physicians.

38 year old Nicholas Hoch was a paratrooper with the U.S. Army in the Persian Gulf. The suit alleges he began treating with Dr. Brookoff after a work injury in 2007, who prescribed ketamine. His wife was concerned about the side effects of the drug so Hoch discontinued taking it.

According to the suit Hoch became despondent and suicidal in January of 2009, after which Brookoff had him admitted to the hospital. There, he continued to receive medications from Brookoff and hospital staff. The suit alleges, however, that they failed to adequately monitor him.

Hoch was later found by a nurse in his hospital bed, unresponsive and not breathing and cyanotic. Medical staff were not able to resuscitate him.

The lawsuit seeks undisclosed damages.

Family settles medical malpractice lawsuit over stillborn infant

Medical malpractice lawyers in Minnesota last year representing the family of a stillborn infant filed a wrongful death birth injury lawsuit against the hospital and attending physician they believed had caused the baby’s death. Lawyers in Jacksonville, Orlando and Ft. Lauderdale, Florida represent families in similar suits on a daily basis.

Based on documents filed with the court it appears the family, hospital and doctor have reached a settlement in the suit.

Rhonda Hartmann was nearly 8 months pregnant in 2006 when she went to Fairmont Medical Center after noticing her child had stopped moving. She was treated by Dr. Marie Morris at that time. Hartmann had hoped to have the infant evaluated or possibly delivered if there was a problem with the pregnancy.

Her lawsuit claimed the hospital and physician did not adhere to the accepted medical standards which led to the death of her daughter. The case was dismissed last week without the option to refile, with both parties paying their own costs and all remaining court documents sealed.

Based on these circumstances it would appear the parties reached an undisclosed settlement of the case. Neither was available for comment.

Family awarded $9.5 million in birth injury medical malpractice case

Medical Malpractice lawyers in Illinios last week reached a settlement in a birth injury case they filed on behalf of a family whose son was born with cerebral palsy after his birth was not attended by the doctor. Lawyers in Jacksonville, Orlando and Ft. Lauderdale Florida represent families on a daily basis for similar suits.

The lawsuit was filed against Sherman Hospital, a nurse midwife and her sponsoring obstetrician based on the 1996 birth of Patrick O’Came. His mother Helen was admitted to Sherman Hospital where Patrick was delivered by nurse midwife Mary Traub. Under hospital regulations, Traub was allowed to deliver babies without an obstetrician present, as long as a sponsoring physician was readily available who was fully responsible for all of the actions taken by her.

On the day of Patrick’s birth, Traub’s sponsoring physician, Dr. Jae Eun Han, was out of the country on vacation but had arranged for another physician to cover his duties. When complications arose during delivery, Traub used a risky procedure, which resulted in a lack of oxygen to the baby for 15 minutes. She also failed to call the backup physician when the infant showed signs of distress. The lack of oxygen during the final 15 minutes of labor resulting in cerebral palsy.

In the settlement of the lawsuit, the hospital, midwife and obstetrician agreed to pay $9.5 million for Patrick’s injuries.

Medical malpractice lawsuit against hospital for son’s surgical injury begins

Lawyers in California last week began arguments in a medical malpractice lawsuit they filed on behalf of a man claiming his son was injured during a surgical procedure for which he did not give consent. The case is complicated by the fact that the child had previously suffered birth injury due to a premature birth.

Eduardo Rivas filed the suit alleging that the unauthorized surgery caused his son Nathan to be dependant on a ventilator and feeding tube due to brain damage. He had previously used only a nasal breathing tube from his 4 month premature birth.

A doctor and social worker from the Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles first contacted Rivas in 2007 when his son was 6 months old saying that he needed a surgery to fix double hernias. Since Nathan’s mother had died after giving birth of breast cancer, the decision was left to Rivas.

Rivas claims he did not give consent for the surgery. Doctors, however, operated on his son Nathan the next day, Nov. 16, 2007. The hospital claims that Rivas gave verbal consent. None of the medical records or consent forms seem to support the claim, however, as shown by an investigation by the California Department of Public Health.

The hospital attributes Nathan’s continued problems to his premature birth.

Rivas is suing for $19 million. He claims that his son’s nursing care alone costs around $1,100 a month and he has the mental capacity of an infant.

Florida woman awarded $10 million for medical malpractice causing birth injury

A woman in Volusia County, FL, near Orlando, whose lawyers filed a lawsuit on her behalf alleging medical malpractice that led to her son developing the birth injury cerebral palsy was recently awarded $10 million.

Margarita Chess filed the lawsuit against Bert Fish Halifax Medical Center, Arnold Palmer Hospital and EVAC ambulance service. She was 6 months pregnant when she presented to Bert Fish in labor.

The hospital would not accept her, instead calling EVAC to transport her to Arnold Palmer in Orlando. Her son was born in the ambulance deprived of oxygen. He is now 6 years old and suffers from cerebral palsy.

A jury awarded a Volusia County woman $10 million after finding the EVAC ambulance service negligent in the premature birth of a boy, now 6 years old and suffering with cerebral palsy.

Chess settled with the hospitals and doctors prior to going to trial for $1.4 million. EVAC proceeded to trial and was found to be responsible for $8.6 million by the jury.

EVAC plans to appeal the ruling.

Parents Win Medical Malpractice Lawsuit over Death of Son

Florida medical malpractice attorneys and birth injury attorneys often represent families who have been affected by the medical mistake of a health care professional. Attorneys in Boston recently won $1.6 million for a family who lost their son after a doctor failed to diagnose a heart defect.

The lawsuit was filed after Antwoine Key collapsed and died on the court while playing basketball for Eastern Connecticut State University in 2005. His death was attributed to a congenital heart defect called hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

The 22 year old senior had been examined by Dr. Dorina Abdulah in 2001, who signed a college medical form clearing him to play. Attorneys for Tony and Angela Key argued that the condition should have been diagnosed by Abdulah, who could have prevented him from playing basketball at the college level and prevented his death.

Abdulah's attorney argued that she scheduled Key for an echocardiogram at a hospital after the initial examination, but that Key did not show up for the second test.

A Boston jury delivered the verdict Friday after five days of deliberations.

Hospital lawsuit alleges negligence caused mans wrongful death

While most lawsuits filed by lawyers in Florida and elsewhere stemming from birth injury or the death of a patient allege medical mistake or medical malpractice, a recent lawsuit filed in Pennsylvania charges that the death of a man was due to a hospital running out of blood reserves.

46 year old John Heynoski was a high school wrestling coach who died of pelvic bleeding after a motorcycle crash. His widow, Josephine Heynoski, filed the lawsuit against Hamot Medical Center this week for his death. The lawsuit states the hospital only had 16 units of blood on reserve when Heynoski died following is crash in July of 2008.

Doctors reportedly wanted to operated on Heynoski at that facility, but then made the decision to transfer him to a Pittsburgh hospital because a radiologist wasn't comfortable working on pelvic injuries. According to the suit Heynoski died while waiting for a medical helicopter after the hospital ran out of blood.

A spokesperson for Hamot had no comment on the lawsuit.

Woman files medical malpractice lawsuit over augmentation surgery mistake

Medical Malpractice attorneys in Florida and elsewhere often come to the aid of their clients who have been affected by hospital error causing birth injury or injury from medical mistakes. A woman in Ohio, however, recently filed an unorthodox lawsuit against her plastic surgeon.

Brittany Daly from Ohio sued her plastic surgeon this week for allegedly using the wrong kind of implants during breast augmentation surgery. The lawsuit against Dr. Beverly Carl alleges Ms. Daly chose to receive silicon breast implants on the advice of Dr. Carl but then obtained saline implants instead during her April 2008 surgery.

She had originally picked the silicone version due to the reduced likelihood that they would ripple, deform or deflate. She claims the doctor told her fiance about the mistake while she was still anesthetized.

The doctor has so far not issued any comment.

Medical Malpractice lawsuits allege hospital performed unnecessary surgeries

Lawyers in Florida and other states often file lawsuits against hospitals for surgical errors or birth injury, however, approximately 50 people in New York are currently suing a hospital for performing surgeries they say weren’t even necessary.

So far, fifty people from around the country have filed medical malpractice lawsuits against North Shore Hospital in Manhasset, NY as well as two of its prominent neurosurgeons, alleging improper surgery was performed.

The two doctors repeatedly diagnosed people with conditions stretching from brain defects to minor back pain and recommended a spinal surgery called a tethered cord surgery. Now several of them allege they are left in worse pain or have developed cysts at the surgical site.

Some of the patients were as young as 4 years old.

Dr. Thomas Milhorat and his protégé Dr. Paulo Bolognese are accused of performing hundreds of unnecessary surgeries to earn millions for themselves and the hospital.

The hospital denies allegations of malpractice and claims the doctors were operating on patients diagnosed with tethered cord syndrome. Dr. Milhorat, who earned an estimated 7 million dollars a year, stepped down from his position as chief last year.

Family files wrongful death suit over hospital medical malpractice

A family in Modesto, CA has filed a medical malpractice wrongful death lawsuit over the 2008 death of their father alleging the hospitals and doctors that treated him were negligent in their care. Lawyers in Florida and other states police hospitals for similar charges.

Brothers Jeff and Joe Rivero filed the suit against Mercy Medical Center Merced, Doctors Medical Center in Modesto and three physicians for the 2008 death of their father, Joe Rivero Sr.

The lawsuit alleges Rivera Sr. came to Mercy hospital on November 6, 2008 complaining of shortness of breath and upper gastric pain radiating to his left arm, and that the facility and a physician failed to perform all necessary services of care.

According to the lawsuit, Mercy then negligently transferred Rivero Sr. to Doctors Medical Center using a ground ambulance although he was not stable enough for the ride.

The suit charges that staff and doctors at Doctors Medical also "were negligent in their care and treatment of (Rivero Sr.'s) cardiac condition which led to his demise."

Neither hospital could be reached for comment.

Medical malpractice lawsuit filed over misdiagnosis

Medical malpractice lawsuits in Florida and elsewhere are often by lawyers representing families affected by birth injury or medical mistakes. A suit filed this week in Pennsylvania stems from the wrongful death of a mother from a hospital’s alleged failure to diagnose a heart condition.

Attorneys for Amy Britt, of Uniontown, filed the suit Monday on behalf of the estate of her late mother, Faith Ann Shumar. Shumar reportedly died last May of a myocardial infarction at the age of 51, five days after visiting the hospital's ER with complaints of chest pain.

The suit charges that the hospital discharged Shumar from the ER even after diagnostic testing showed irregularities with her heart. The ECG was performed based on her complaints of chest pain going into her left arm, and her shortness of breath.

The lawsuit alleges that, although the hospital should have admitted Shumar for more testing based on knowledge of her risk factors for heart disease, it discharged her with a diagnosis of non-cardiac chest pain, contributing to her untimely death.

Illinois Supreme Court strikes down medical malpractice damage limits

The Supreme Court in Illinois has joined Florida and several other states in eliminating a law that would have capped damages in birth injury and medical malpractice cases. Attorneys who represent patients who were the victims of mistake are praising the decision.

The law, originally enacted in 2005, had capped non-monetary damages in medical malpractice lawsuits, such as for pain and suffering. The high court found that such a statute violates the separation of powers between the judicial and legislative branches, and interferes with "the authority of the judicial branch to reduce verdicts."

The case at hand alleged malpractice against a hospital, doctor and nurse involved in the delivery of a brain-damaged baby. The new law would have capped damages in such cases at $1 million against hospitals and their personnel and $500,000 against individual doctors.

The Illinois Supreme Court had found similar laws unconstitutional in 1997 and in 1976. Proponents of patient rights are hoping that a third such decision will keep the insurance company lobbyists away for a while.

Lawyers file medical malpractice lawsuit against hospital over stints

Although medical malpractice lawsuits in Florida and elsewhere are usually based on birth injury or medical mistakes by hospitals or their staff, lawyers in Baltimore, Maryland recently filed a suit based on greed.

Lawyers there filed a class-action lawsuit against St. Joseph Medical Center for unnecessarily performing stint implants on more than 350 patients. The hospital recently informed former patients that they could have received stints even though their arteries weren't clogged enough to require the procedure.

According to the lawsuit, the unnecessary procedures, which cost approximately $10,000, were performed out of greed. The hospital issued a statement refusing to comment, but indicating that the procedures had been performed by one doctor who no longer worked there.

Hospital, doctor and patient settle medical malpractice lawsuit

Lawyers in Florida and elsewhere routinely file lawsuits against hospitals and doctors for medical mistakes or birth injury. A suit brought by a New York woman who became disabled as a result of a surgery was settled this week.

Martha Meyer, from Poughkeepsie, NY filed the suit against Vassar Brothers Medical Center and the estate of her surgeon who has since passed away, Dr. Barry Jordan.

Meyer had surgery with Jordan for a perforated ulcer in September of 2003. Six days after the procedure, she was readmitted to the hospital for internal bleeding. According to the suit, due to her blood loss, she sustained brain damage; the loss of her teeth, a thumb and parts of two fingers and other injuries.

The trial had just begun on January 6. The presiding judge approved a settlement last Wednesday. The parties have agreed to keep the terms confidential.

New Hampshire to join other States in requiring hospitals to report error

Attorneys in Florida and other states file lawsuits daily for birth injury and medical malpractice mistakes committed by hospitals. Now, New Hampshire joins several states in effectuating a new law that requires facilities to make public reports of avoidable medical mistakes to the public, something some say is long overdue.

According to the Institute Of Medicine, medical mistakes in hospitals are a leading cause of death in this country each year. Unfortunately, however, most states have little concrete evidence for things such as mistaken medication or surgical errors. Patients or consumers who want to compare facilities have so far had to rely on internet sites that publish Medicare statistics or information that hospitals volunteer.

"They want this thing moved on, kept in a drawer, don't tell the public," said Rep. Peter Batula, R-Merrimack. "This will bring it out in the open." The state congressman worked through what he described as heavy resistance to pass two bills that would require hospitals to report medical mistakes and hospital-acquired infections.

New Hampshire now joins dozens of other states that already require public hospital reporting.

Trial to begin in Katrina hospital medical malpractice case

Hospitals in Florida and elsewhere are often sued for medical malpractice and birth injury as the result of mistakes made by doctors and staff. However, a recent lawsuit filed by lawyers in New Orleans stemming from a patients death in the wake of hurricane Katrina is raising a new question: is the hospital responsible for the wrongful death of a patient due to the loss of power?

Lawyers have begun selecting a jury and opening remarks are expected today in a case filed against Pendleton Memorial Methodist Hospital by relatives of Althea LaCoste. This is believed to be the first lawsuit over a hospital patient's death after Katrina.

LaCoste was recovering from pneumonia and on a ventilator when her family took her to the hospital the night before the hurricane came ashore. She passed away when the hospital lost its emergency electrical power and her ventilator failed.

Over 100 people died at hospitals and nursing homes in greater New Orleans after the August 2005 hurricane. Pendleton has yet to reopen since the storm.

Mother of nine files medical malpractice lawsuit over mistaken sterilization

While hospitals in Orlando, Florida are often sued over birth injury or medical mistake, lawyers in Massachusetts recently filed an interesting lawsuit after a mother of nine who asked for birth control following her most recent delivery was sterilized instead without her consent.

35 year old Tessa Savicki filed suit against Baystate Medical Center alleging that the hospital, doctors and nurses originally agreed to implant an IUD but rather sterilized her by performing a tubal ligation.

Savicki's attorney, who is also a licensed OB-GYN, said his client was devastated when she found out about the procedure after giving birth in 2006.

Medical Malpractice Lawsuit charges Central Florida hospital with negligence

Lawyers for a Plant City gentleman have filed a medical malpractice suit against Brandon Regional Hospital, alleging negligence and wrongful death from the death of his wife of 39 years. The same hospital has been sued in the past for birth injury.

Intense shoulder and neck pain sent Mabel Mosley to the hospital’s ER last year, where physicians immediately started her on pain medication. Even though these meds relieved her of almost all her pain, however, the suit alleges she was repeatedly given doses of a powerful time release narcotic that literally medicated her to death.

The hospital utilized a computerized "Narcotic Delivery System" that was supposed to prevent such overmedication according to Mr. Mosley’s attorney. He claims they have also failed to release hospital records.

Mosley for now is only suing the hospital pharmacists and the hospital's parent company. By Florida law, the doctor has 90 days to answer questions about the case before he can be sued as well.

Underaged drinker files medical malpractice suit for leg amputations

A western Pennsylvania woman last week filed a medical malpractice lawsuit against a hospital which she claims wrongfully amputated her legs after she passed out unconscious. Lawyers in Florida and elsewhere routinely file suits against hospitals for medical errors and birth injury.

Shanna Hiles was partying for her 20th birthday when she drank herself unconscious and passed out with her legs pinned under her for 12 hours. She was taken to Uniontown Hospital, then transferred to a Pittsburgh hospital several hours later where both legs were partially amputated at the knee.

Hiles’ medical malpractice suit against Uniontown and one of its emergency physicians claims they didn’t properly treat her by diagnosing her condition or working to restore circulation to her legs.

A hospital spokeswoman has declined to comment on the suit filed Tuesday.

Embattled doctor settles twelfth medical malpractice suit

With the high volume of patients and procedures in Florida, doctors here often face multiple threats of medical malpractice and birth injury cases during their careers. A former Lancaster, PA orthopedic surgeon, however, has been sued 27 times since 2002 and over a dozen times in recent years.

Lawyers recently settled one of his last remaining cases since closing his practice. Dr. Anthony Mauriello, along with his former clinic and the hospital where he performed surgery have agreed to pay $650,000 to the widow of a 54-year-old man who died a few days following a surgery in 2003.

Lorraine Ruhl filed the suit after the death of her husband, Michael, two days after Mauriello performed surgery on him at Lancaster Regional Medical Center in November 2003 to replace his right hip. Mr. Ruhl died on Nov. 14.

During the procedure, Ruhl, a 54-year-old construction foreman who had elected the surgery, lost more than 4 quarts of blood. The lawsuit claimed this was "an excessive amount of blood for this procedure.” Following surgery, he continued to bleed and subsequently died.

The lawsuit charged that Mauriello "created a situation where Mr. Ruhl lost a tremendous amount of blood and did not properly intervene to resolve the bleeding."

The suit further claimed that neither Mauriello nor other health care providers at the hospital "intervened to identify the cause of the blood loss and correct it until too late."

Woman files medical malpractice lawsuit against hospital after HIV exposure

A New York City woman has filed a medical malpractice lawsuit against St. Vincent Hospital after a routine medical procedure exposed her to dirty equipment carrying the HIV virus. Lawyers in Florida routinely file lawsuits for hospital error causing injury to patients or birth injury.

Milvia Lopez underwent an echocardiogram in June of 2007 at St. Vincent's Hospital Manhattan. According to her lawsuit, the hospital used an unsterilized scope. Hours after she was discharged, she received an emergency phone call asking her to return. The hospital even sent a limo to pick her up, according to the suit.

Upon returning to the hospital, Lopez was informed that equipment which had not been sterilized had been used in her procedure and that she had been exposed to HIV, hepatitis B and hepatitis C. She was immediately prescribed medicine to treat HIV, along with some antibiotics to fight other bacteria.

The lawsuit claims that the mistake caused Lopez psychological and emotional trauma - she lost her hair during an HIV treatment and her shame kept her confined in her home. It also claims the hospital "engaged in a cover-up which included the withholding of relevant medical records."

New York man suing city after medics throw his ear in trash

Most newsworthy medical lawsuits involve people suing hospitals for birth injury or medical malpractice. Lawyers representing a New York man, however, recently filed suit against a Bronx hospital and the city after his ear was thrown in the garbage.

67 year old Eduardo Garcia had a large part of his upper ear ripped off by a bull terrier belonging to his son on May 10, 2008. Emergency workers transported the salvaged ear on ice in the ambulance, but when they arrived at Montefiore Medical Center, the EMS workers threw the ear in the trash.

The lawsuit alleges the ear was tossed by workers because they feared it was too risky to reattach it. "Now, he's got a deformity," said Garcia's lawyer, Andrew Friedman. "They deprived him of an opportunity to have treatment."

Hospital records show that Garcia’s ear was discarded due to “the potential risk of contamination or infection” if it was reattached. But Friedman said the father should have had the option to rebuild his ear and was left instead with 22 stitches, two staples and no ear lobe.

The city has now filed it own suit against Montefiore, claiming EMS workers were only following hospital orders when they threw the ear in the trash.

Garcia and Montefiore declined comment.

New Jersey Hospital caught in fraud pays $3 million to settle suit

Lawsuits against hospitals typically involve medical malpractice or birth injuries. Lawyers for a former employee whistleblower and the U.S. Department of Justice, however, have been pursuing a case against a New Jersey hospital for years under charges that it violated the False Claims Act by ripping off Medicare.

Trinitas Regional Medical Center has now agreed to pay more than $3 million to settle the suit claiming it defrauded Medicare.

The resolution was announced this week by the U.S. Justice Department, ending a qui tam whistleblower lawsuit filed in 2005 against Trinitas. The suit alleged the hospital fraudulently inflated charges to Medicare patients to obtain enhanced reimbursement.

Lawyers from the Department said the suit was settled for just over $3 million, plus interest. The agreement calls for the whistleblower litigant, Tony Kite, to receive roughly $679,000 of the total amount.

Study shows Merck cholesterol pill Zetia may be harmful

Lawyers representing patients who took the cholesterol pill Zetia may soon be preparing for medical malpractice or even birth injury cases based on a new study. The results, released this week at and an American Heart Association conference in Orlando, Florida, raised new concerns over the Merck drug and its cousin, Vytorin.

Millions of Americans still take one or both drugs to lower cholesterol, despite concerns raised last year about how well they work. In the recent study, Zetia did nothing to shrink buildups in artery walls, while a rival drug, Niaspan, did so significantly. Researchers were also concerned that Zetia users suffered more heart attacks and other health problems while on the drug, although the frequency of those events were too small to draw firm conclusions.

"This study provides no evidence that would reassure us that this drug is beneficial, and it provides some evidence that it may be harmful," said Yale University cardiologist Dr. Harlan Krumholz, who did not particpate in the study.

The results were being published in the New England Journal of Medicine at the same time they were revealed at the conference. They are likely to cause even less doctors to prescribe Zetia and Vytorin.

Medical malpractice trial over actor’s late brother to begin this week

A wrongful death medical malpractice lawsuit filed by actor James Woods over the death of his brother at a Rhode Island hospital is set to start this week. Lawyers file similar suits in Florida and elsewhere for birth injury and medical mistakes.

Woods is alleging that his younger brother, Michael, received negligent care at Kent Hospital in Rhode Island, where he died in 2006 of what was believed to be a heart attack. He was 49 years old at the time.

The trial is set to begin Monday in Kent County Superior Court. It has not been disclosed how much money or other damages Woods is seeking in the lawsuit.

Lawyers for both sides have declined to comment. Woods told The Associated Press that he was seeking "justice" for his brother but would not discuss the case in detail.

Heart surgeon cleared of negligence in medical malpractice suit

A jury this week found in favor of an Alabama surgeon accused of negligence in a medical malpractice case. Lawyers filed the suit on behalf of the son of a 79 year old woman who passed away following surgery in 2001. Similar cases are filed in Florida for surgical error as well as birth injury.

While undergoing open heart surgery for a blockage in 2001, doctors punctured the superior vena cava of 79 year old Elwanda Franz. Although they located and fixed the laceration during the same surgery, Ms. Franz died 16 months afterward. Her son alleged that the damage her body sustained significantly shortened her life. He also claimed that the doctor was negligent in not repairing the damage quickly enough during the surgery.

Two other physicians named in the suit had reached settlements prior to trial. A suit against the hospital was separated by the judge, meaning that the case against the doctors would have to be proven before the hospital was liable.

The jury deliberated for 45 minutes after a three week trial.

Family settles Birth Injury Malpractice Suit for $77 Million

A New York family and their lawyers settled a medical malpractice case this week brought against the doctors and hospital responsible for their child’s permanent birth injury. Similar cases are often filed by attorneys in Florida.

The case centered around a 3-year old boy who allegedly developed cerebral palsy as a result of unnecessary delays during his birth. The medical malpractice suit that was filed was settled for $77,418,670.

The boy’s mother, Mariana Baizan, charged that the delivery staff at St. John's Riverside Hospital, as well as OBGYN Dr. Shahram Razman, ignored signs that indicated the fetus was suffering oxygen deficiency. Baizan further alleged that instead of performing a Caesarean delivery, her doctor waited nearly an hour before beginning a vaginal delivery.

Parents file medical malpractice suit for football player

The parents of a high school football star who died following massive head injuries during football practice have filed a medical malpractice suit against the hospital that released him. Similar lawsuits for medical mistakes and birth injury are also filed by lawyers in Florida.

17 year old Kyle Wilson suffered a head injury while practicing, was released after being examined at the West Penn Allegheny Health System and Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, then died while a spectator at a game on October 23, 2008.

The suit by his parents alleges that doctors at both facilities failed to recognize and treat the Coraopolis youth for severe head injuries despite symptoms including repeated vomiting, numbness, decreased consciousness and nausea.

Officials of Children's Hospital and West Penn have not commented.

Family settles Birth Injury Malpractice Suit for $77 Million

A New York family and their lawyers settled a medical malpractice case this week brought against the doctors and hospital responsible for their child’s permanent birth injury. Similar cases are often filed by attorneys in Florida.

The case centered around a 3-year old boy who allegedly developed cerebral palsy as a result of unnecessary delays during his birth. The medical malpractice suit that was filed was settled for $77,418,670.

The boy’s mother, Mariana Baizan, charged that the delivery staff at St. John's Riverside Hospital, as well as OBGYN Dr. Shahram Razman, ignored signs that indicated the fetus was suffering oxygen deficiency. Baizan further alleged that instead of performing a Caesarean delivery, her doctor waited nearly an hour before beginning a vaginal delivery.

Over 200 people file medical malpractice suit due to radiation exposure

Hospitals in Florida and elsewhere are often sued for medical negligence or birth injuries because of insufficient treatment by staff. Much more seldom are cases filed due to the improper use of equipment. That was the case this week, however, when over 200 patients filed suit against a Los Angeles hospital.

Patients who were exposed to high levels of radiation at Cedars-Sinai Hospital after undergoing routine CT scans filed suit Tuesday, and lawyers believed more patients would come forward as word of the lawsuit spread.

The president of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center commented that he regretted the circumstances that led to the mistake. Patients were exposed to eight times the recommended radiation at the facility in recent months after undergoing brain tests related to a stroke.

"We take very seriously our responsibility for operating medical equipment in the safest possible manner," said Thomas Priselac, CEO of the hospital.

California public health officials are investigating the incident, which exposed patients to high radiation during an 18-month period beginning in February 2008. They are also urging all hospitals to review their standards for operating CT scanners - which emit radiation, but usually in doses that don't put patients at risk.

State’s largest hospital being sued for medical malpractice

Hospitals in Florida and other states are routinely sued for medical malpractice and birth injury mistakes stemming from infection, emergency room or delivery room errors. But the state of Vermont has somehow had fewer cases filed than any other. According to lawyers, the odds have been stacked against the injured party in the past.

That may change with the recent start of a lawsuit against the state’s largest hospital, who is being accused of negligence that permanently crippled a patient.

73-year-old Robert Erlandson was left crippled after a team of well regarded surgeons replaced both of his knees at Fletcher-Allen Heath Care. Ironically, Erlandson, a cancer researcher for 38 years, is a doctor himself. According to his lawyer, he suffered serious nerve damage in the surgery that took place 5 1/2 years ago at the facility.

Erlandson is suing Fletcher-Allen for medical malpractice. He claims the surgical team negligently misapplied a tourniquet, damaged the nerves to his lower left leg and changed his life forever. The hospital denies any negligence.

According to statistics from the U.S. Bureau of Justice, the national odds of an injured patient prevailing in a medical malpractice lawsuit are approximately 1 in 7. In Vermont, however, the odds are far less. "If the case goes to trial here in Vermont probably 95% are won by the health care company or the physician," said trial lawyer Jerry O'Neil.

Florida Medical Negligence lawsuit charges hospital error in man's death

Florida lawyers are often approached by clients who believe their injuries or birth injury is the result of the medical malpractice of a hospital or its staff. In some tragic instances, however, they can only help the family of a loved one who has already passed away from medical mistake.

In a recent South Florida case, the estate of an elderly man is alleging that the staff at Indian River Medical Center emergency room made mistakes that led to his death two months after his discharge in 2008.

Thomas Browne was 76 when he passed away from a cerebral hemorrhage. The lawsuit from his estate is alleging the condition was caused by internal brain bleeding from falling from an emergency room bed without side rails.

The mistake, as well as a broken leg that resulted from the fall, was missed for hours after his admission for observation on Jan. 20, 2008, according to his attorney. Representatives from the hospital have declined comment.

Browne’s estate is suing for an unspecified amount of financial damages on behalf of his six children, according to the pleadings.

Lawyers secure $5.75 million award in birth injury medical malpractice case

Lawyers for a 4-year-old boy obtained a large settlement from the University of California hospital system recently for the boy’s cerebral palsy birth injury. Lawyers in Florida have settled similar cases for families in birth injury and other medical malpractice cases.

According to court filings, the Davis Medical Center agreed to pay $5.75 million to settle a lawsuit filed for the child’s brain injuries during his birth at the hospital. A Sacramento judge approved the deal last week for the birth of Cannon Hoops on Dec. 1, 2004.

The lawyer for the boy’s parents filed a medical malpractice lawsuit alleging that the staff at Davis were negligent in causing the boy's cerebral palsy. Counsel for the University of California Board of Regents stated that the settlement is the largest the university system has paid to settle a medical malpractice claim.

Medical Malpractice Trial underway in student’s death

A Pennsylvania facility is being sued for medical malpractice stemming from the death of a college student. According to lawyers, lawsuits against hospitals are usually due to medical mistakes or birth injury.

The medical malpractice case will go before the court this week stemming from the death of a University of Pennsylvania sophomore two years ago.

19 year old Anne Ryan passed away in September of 2007.

Her family charges that the Hospital at the University of Pennsylvania was negligent in performing a lumbar puncture on a patient suffering from brain swelling, causing a herniation of her brain and killing her.

The hospital responds that Ryan received outstanding medical care and that the lumbar puncture - usually known as a spinal tap - is the standard test for meningitis.

Florida Dept. of Health clears doctors in Medical Malpractice case

The Florida Department of Health Board of Medicine, responsible for regulating doctors involving medical malpractice and birth injury matters, has cleared two doctors who have been sued for the much-publicized death of Boca Raton teenager Stephanie Kuleba.

The then-18 year old Boca Raton cheerleader died in March 2008 from an acute reaction to anesthesia given during routine surgery. According to a lawsuit filed by her parents, while undergoing breast implant surgery, she became gravely ill; her heart rate increased, her muscles stiffened and her body temperature spiked, eventually causing organ failure. She went into cardiac arrest on her way to the hospital and had to be resuscitated, but died within 24 hours.

An autopsy by the Palm Beach County Medical Examiner's Office found that she had a rare condition called malignant hyperthermia and her death was ruled an accident. This was a shock especially since she had always been healthy and active.

In a response from the Department of Health dated April 29, they indicate that complaints against the surgeon and anesthesiologist were dismissed due to "insufficient evidence" that the physicians violated standards of medical practice.

The girls parents, Joanne and Tom Kuleba, are frustrated with the decision because they say they knew nothing about a state inquiry being started, let alone concluded. Because of the secrecy they suspect that the medical establishment is just protecting its own. For some reason, the letters were addressed to Stephanie Kuleba, even though by then she had been dead for more than a year.

The DOH official who sent the letters, Assistant General Counsel Juanita Powell-Williams, wrote she was advising Stephanie of the dismissals as the filer of the complaint.

"You fall behind this black wall of secrecy," Tom Kuleba says. "They literally will tell you nothing."

Florida judge set to hear arguments on denture cream cases

In a case with possible medical malpractice implications, a Federal Judge in Miami is set to hear arguments from lawyers this month on whether trials should proceed against denture cream companies for injuries allegedly caused by the zinc in their products. Parents are awaiting further testing to determine if the chemical may cause birth injury as well.

At least 25 lawsuits from 11 different states have been filed by people against consumer product giants Procter & Gamble Co., maker of Fixodent, and GlaxoSmithKline, who produces PoliGrip. Users have alleged various nerve-related disorders as a result of using the products, which they claim contains unhealthy amounts of zinc.

The cases follow the release of a 2008 report in the medical journal Neurology about a possible link between denture cream zinc and nerve damage. Physicians at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas studied 4 patients who all used excessive amounts of denture cream and had various nerve-related disorders.

While the researchers did not say that their findings proved denture cream caused the problems, they believed the issue warranted further study. The human body needs both zinc and copper in the proper amounts. Zinc is commonly found in a multitude of foods, vitamin supplements and even cold lozenges. Too much zinc, however, may purge the body of copper.

A deficiency of copper in the body can cause nerve damage, resulting in symptoms such as weakness and numbness in arms and legs; difficulty walking and loss of balance; and even cognitive or memory impairment, according to the National Institutes of Health.

The companies that produce denture cream claim it is safe when used as directed. It is added to the product to help with the adhesive strength. The FDA, who is responsible for regulating denture adhesives, has not issued any warnings about the products. In actuality, the amount of zinc found in the recommended use amount of denture cream is almost the same as the amount found in a 6-ounce hamburger, and the majority of users experience no problems.

The lawsuits claim the products are defective, that the companies failed to adequately warn people about the potential dangers and that no corrective steps were taken. The product liability lawsuits are seeking medical expenses and unspecified damages.

Trial starts this week for Paxil birth injury lawsuit

A Philadelphia woman is suing GlaxoSmithKline P.L.C. in a medical malpractice case on behalf of her now 4 year-old son, alleging that its superdrug Paxil caused his birth injuries and heart problems. The suit also alleges that the company ignored evidence that its antidepressant Paxil may have caused birth defects for years.

Lawyer Sean Tracey told the court that Pennsylvania resident Michelle David, a former dancer for the 76ers, took the drug during her pregnancy. Glaxo is headquartered in London, but employs several thousand people in the Philadelphia region. Tracey also alleged that the company told its scientists to avoid disclosing possible risks associated with the drug's use by pregnant women.

"GSK said if there is any doubt, take it out," Tracey said, quoting from the company's core safety philosophy. "That's the exact opposite of what the regulations say, which is that if there is any evidence of association, you need to put it in."

GlaxoSmithKline's lawyer Chilton Varner said there is no evidence that Paxil caused Kilker's heart problems.

The trial is the first of over 600 cases charging that Glaxo knew Paxil caused birth injury and hid those risks to increase profits. Approved for U.S. use in 1992, the drug generated about $942 million in sales last year, 2.1 percent of Glaxo's total sales.

Despite pressure, Oklahoma mother opts for traditional birth after C-sections

Traditional births are usually strongly cautioned against or even prohibited by doctors after a mother has already undergone a C-section birth. The real reason for this, it turns out, are restrictions in coverage from insurance companies who want to guard against Medical Malpractice or birth injury lawsuits from lawyers. An Oklahoma mother, however, recently bucked the trend and is happy with her decision.

After Michelle English became pregnant with her last child, she had to find a new obstetrician. Her prior physician refused to allow her to try a vaginal delivery because she’d already undergone two cesarean sections.

English felt that her previous two C-sections had been unnecessary because her babies weren’t as large as predicted, and the longer recovery time made it harder to bond with the babies and care for her family.

"I had this profound sadness that I could be the mother of three children and never have had a contraction,” she said.

Many doctors don’t allow vaginal birth after cesarean, or VBAC, or can’t allow it because of malpractice insurance rules. But English found a physician that would talk to her about the risks. Her third son, Hudson, was born vaginally and without complications April 7.

"I felt totally and completely empowered like I could do anything in the world,” English said.

English’s new obstetrician, Dr. Robert Ryan, said he changed liability insurance providers when the state’s largest insurer, PLICO, announced several years ago that it would not provide malpractice insurance for VBAC. The procedure is allowed by his current insurer.

Some doctors fear that the cesarean scar may rupture from contractions during a vaginal delivery or that the uterus may rupture, but that’s rare, Ryan said.

"VBAC is not for everybody, but the success rates are reasonable and the risks are fairly low,” he said.

Dr. Eric Knudtson, a maternal fetal specialist at OU Medical Center, said C-sections also pose significant risks such as infection and blood loss.

"Most women want the experience of vaginal delivery,” he said. "But there’s less access and less willingness on the part of the physicians.”

Of women who try VBAC, 60 to 80 percent succeed and are able to give birth vaginally, according to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

English said women need to be educated about their options and question policies they believe are unfair.

"A woman has a right to bear her children in the way she deems fit,” she said.

New Jersey leads charge on fighting hospital error - will Florida follow?

New Jersey governor Jon S. Corzine this week signed a law into measure that will require hospitals to report on their mistakes and performance in patient-safety areas. The law will affect how medical malpractice, birth injuries and serious medical errors are handled. Lawyers and consumer advocates are calling for Florida to pass similar legislation, in a state that has long shielded institutions and their insurers.

The New Jersey law will also prevent hospitals from making patients pay for treatment resulting from serious medical errors.

"This is a major victory for consumer protection in New Jersey," said Senate Majority Leader Stephen Sweeney, D-GloucEster, who was among the legislation's sponsors. "Hospital-specific reporting will improve patient safety," added another sponsor, Assemblyman Herb Conaway, D-Burlington.

Patient-safety statistics now must be disclosed in an annual report on hospitals prepared by th estate Department of Health and Senior Services. Records will be kept on surgery on the wrong body part, objects left inside patients, and injuries from post-surgery falls. Sweeney noted patient-safety indicators "already are collected by the industry and the state. It's time that we share this information with the public, to let them make the best decisions possible and control their own medical destiny."

Nationwide, excess charges due to preventable medical errors exceed $9 billion a year, observed Sy Larson, president of AARP New Jersey, which supports the new law.

Hospitals trying new approach to medical malpractice: Honesty

6-year-old Kaelyn Sosa was permanently disabled with a brain injury when she was only a toddler after a Miami, Florida hospital committed medical error. A breathing tube was dislodged cutting off her oxygen under sedation causing the brain injury. Although Baptist Children’s Hospital responded as they often do in birth injury and medical malpractice cases, they also went a step beyond.

In addition to settling with the family for an undisclosed sum, the hospital administrators studied the events that led to the accident in order to put new standards in place to prevent similar mistakes and respond quicker when they do occur. They also asked the parents to participate in educating the staff about the critical importance of proper medical care.

Kaelyn’s mother, Sandy, now helps the hospital protect other patients from such accidents. She serves as a community liaison on the hospital's quality-and-patient-safety committee. "We wanted something good to come out of what happened to our daughter," she says.

Up to 98,000 Americans die every year from medical errors, according to the Institute of Medicine, a government advisory group. In trying to reduce this number rather than just pay for the mistakes, some hospitals like Baptist Children's are beginning to admit grievous mistakes and learn from them in order to correct flawed procedures. That represents a sharp departure from hospitals' traditional response when something goes terribly wrong—retreating behind a wall of silence to guard against potential lawsuits.

Hospitals hope that by being more open with injured patients and their families, they may slow the tide of lawsuits. While some legal experts warn that such admissions could lead to an increase in litigation and costs, there is an indication that patients are less likely to sue if they receive full disclosure and an apology, along with an offer of compensation. The new approach can also work towards the long term goal of improving hospital safety records.

"Sorry alone doesn't work unless we learn from our mistakes," says Timothy McDonald, a pediatric anesthesiologist and chief safety officer at the University of Illinois Medical Center in Chicago. "We have to also make promises that this won't happen again and get patients and families engaged in the effort to improve our performance."

Dr. McDonald says that over the past four years, the number of lawsuits against the center is down 40% compared to the period between 1999 and 2004, even though the number of procedures increased 23%. While it can't say for certain that the disclosure program was responsible for the decreases, "we can certainly say that it has not caused an increase in lawsuits or payouts," he says.

Paralyzed Florida woman will testify today in her own medical malpractice lawsuit

A Florida woman will testify in her own medical malpractice case today in Naples from a gurney chair. She has been a paraplegic since 2005 when she suffered an epidural abscess. Her suit alleges three doctors are guilty of medical malpractice which contributed to her condition. She settled the portion of her case against the hospital for a confidential amount just before the trial. Similar lawsuits are filed against Florida hospitals for birth injuries.

Sheila Matthews is a 55-year-old mother of three. She walked into the emergency room of NCH North Naples Hospital in March of 2005 in extreme pain. She had suffered from diabetes, peripheral neuropathy and bipolar disorder in the past, but the former nurse knew something was different on that day.

On Monday, a nurse’s aide will roll Matthews’ gurney chair into Judge Cynthia Pivacek’s courtroom, where Matthews will tell the seven-man, one-woman jury, including two alternates, what happened. Matthews, whose diagnosis is permanent, irreversible paraplegia and quadriparesis, hasn’t been in the courtroom since opening statements.

Matthews’ 2007 medical malpractice lawsuit alleges she suffered from progressive neurological deterioration after she was admitted March 29, 2005. Six days later, she was transported to NCH Downtown Naples Hospital for a lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Two days later, another MRI found a large epidural abscess on her spine.

A neurological consult was immediately requested and decompressive surgery was performed to remove it. But it was too late: Matthews had suffered severe, permanent neurological dysfunction.

Among the lawsuit’s allegations are that the defendants were negligent for failing to perform proper nursing assessments; not notifying doctors of significant changes in her condition; failing to perform timely MRIs; not documenting nursing assessments; not admitting her into the intensive care unit for close monitoring; and failing to identify and recognize Matthews’ progressive neurological condition.

She told jurors the estimate for her care for the rest of her life is $4.7 million.

University spends $1.2 million on Medical Malpractice settlements in six months

Records released Tuesday by The University of Iowa show that the school has paid over $1.2 million to settle medical malpractice lawsuits this year. It was not clear whether any of the settlements were for birth injury cases. Florida universities face similar lawsuits for malpractice claims in their hospitals.

The amount covered settlements for six medical malpractice lawsuits and $392,581 in attorney fees. Insurance covered $659,818 of the total, including $425,000 toward settlement of one medical malpractice lawsuit and all attorney fees reported by the U of I for medical malpractice cases.

The university did not admit liability in any of the settlements.

Woman’s family awarded $1 million in medical malpractice suit

A family who filed a medical malpractice suit against the two doctors responsible for the care of a Connecticut woman who died five days after ovarian surgery received $1 million for her wrongful death. Such cases may also be filed against doctors responsible for birth injuries.

A lawyer for the woman’s estate confirmed the award last week.

The money is from a settlement of her relatives' lawsuit against doctors Margarita Olivares and Harold Bodin, both affiliated with the Norwich OB-GYN Group.

Beaudoin died in July 2006 at the William W. Backus Hospital in Norwich. She was 60. Court documents say Olivares tore Beaudoin's colon during the surgery.

Bodin and his lawyer, who also represents Olivares, did not immediately return phone messages Friday. Olivares, who now practices in New York City, was not at her office Friday and her home number could not be found.

Woman’s family awarded $1 million in medical malpractice suit

A family who filed a medical malpractice suit against the two doctors responsible for the care of a Connecticut woman who died five days after ovarian surgery received $1 million for her wrongful death. Such cases may also be filed against doctors responsible for birth injuries.

A lawyer for the woman’s estate confirmed the award last week.

The money is from a settlement of her relatives' lawsuit against doctors Margarita Olivares and Harold Bodin, both affiliated with the Norwich OB-GYN Group.

Beaudoin died in July 2006 at the William W. Backus Hospital in Norwich. She was 60. Court documents say Olivares tore Beaudoin's colon during the surgery.

Bodin and his lawyer, who also represents Olivares, did not immediately return phone messages Friday. Olivares, who now practices in New York City, was not at her office Friday and her home number could not be found.

Jury awards $1.8 million paid in heart condition medical malpractice case

A New Jersey woman originally awarded $4 million in a medical malpractice case was paid $1.8 last week after a jury found in her favor in June. She had filed a lawsuit claiming that a physician misdiagnosed her heart condition which caused her to need a transplant. Similar failure to diagnose cases, as well as birth injury cases, are common in Florida.

24 year old Leslie Thorne originally filed the claim against three ER doctors who provided treatment at Mary Immaculate Hospital, Dr. David Glick, William Hunter and Andrew B. Cole. Although she was awarded $4 million by the jury, the judgment was later reduced to $1.8 million because of caps on medical damages in Virginia.

Thorne had visited the ER at Sentara Port Warwick in June of 2005 with complaints of shortness of breath, coughing and chest pain. Although X-rays showed an enlarged heart, Dr. Cole, an attending physician at the time, diagnoses bronchitis and gave her an antibiotic.

A few weeks later at the same facility, Dr. Hunter diagnosed her with a virus and gave her an anti-nausea prescription.

When her problems worsened, Thorne went to the emergency room at Mary Immaculate Hospital. She complained again of chest pain and shortness of breath, but also had swelling in her legs, an enlarged heart and an abnormal electrocardiogram, records showed.

On that visit, Dr. Glick diagnosed her with hepatitis and told her to follow up with her primary care physician.

Five weeks after her first complaints, doctors at St. Agnes Hospital in Baltimore finally diagnosed Thorne with a rare heart condition caused by childbirth. She later received a heart transplant. Her attorney argued that if she had been properly diagnosed earlier, she could have been treated with medicine and wouldn't have needed a transplant. She now may need another transplant and will have to take medicine for the rest of her life.

Medical Malpractice insurer bought for $45.6 million in cash deal

A Florida company has made a deal to purchase Advocate, MD Financial Group Inc., a Texas-based company that furnishes medical malpractice insurance for medical and birth injuries.

FPIC Insurance Group, headquartered in Jacksonville, Florida, will initially spend $33.6 million in cash to purchase Advocate, MD, with an agreement to pay up to $12 million more over the next two years depending on the firm’s performance.

Advocate’s CEO Mark Adams, who founded the company and still owns approximately 20 percent, will also get up to $2 million to execute a noncompete agreement, though he will remain on as chief executive.

Advocate is the 4th largest provider of medical malpractice insurance in Texas and also provides coverage in Mississippi.

Man brings medical malpractice suit for surgery on wrong knee

A man has filed a medical malpractice lawsuit asking for over $50,000 in damages, claiming that doctors "surgically invaded' the wrong knee during a knee replacement surgery at a west suburban hospital. Similar cases have been filed in Florida for wrongful amputations and birth injuries.

The patient, Krzysztof Kordes filed the lawsuit Tuesday in Chicago against his surgeon Dr. Scott A. Seymore, his surgical assistant and their practice, for a surgery that occurred on May 6, 2008. He was supposed to undergo a right knee arthroscopy, partial lateral meniscectomy and ACL reconstruction. The operation, however, left him with cartilage damage to his left knee.

The surgeon and assistant allegedly prepped Kordes’ left knee then began performing replacement surgery on that knee. At some point, however, they both realized they were operating on the wrong knee and began removing the surgical instruments and sutured the incisions. The doctors then continued to operate on his right knee, as planned.

Kordes was later diagnosed with chondromalaci patealla to his left knee — a general term indicating damage to the cartilage under the kneecap. The five-count medical negligence suit seeks more than $50,000 on each count, plus the costs of the suit.

Man brings medical malpractice suit for surgery on wrong knee

A man has filed a medical malpractice lawsuit asking for over $50,000 in damages, claiming that doctors "surgically invaded' the wrong knee during a knee replacement surgery at a west suburban hospital. Similar cases have been filed in Florida for wrongful amputations and birth injuries.

The patient, Krzysztof Kordes filed the lawsuit Tuesday in Chicago against his surgeon Dr. Scott A. Seymore, his surgical assistant and their practice, for a surgery that occurred on May 6, 2008. He was supposed to undergo a right knee arthroscopy, partial lateral meniscectomy and ACL reconstruction. The operation, however, left him with cartilage damage to his left knee.

The surgeon and assistant allegedly prepped Kordes’ left knee then began performing replacement surgery on that knee. At some point, however, they both realized they were operating on the wrong knee and began removing the surgical instruments and sutured the incisions. The doctors then continued to operate on his right knee, as planned.

Kordes was later diagnosed with chondromalaci patealla to his left knee — a general term indicating damage to the cartilage under the kneecap. The five-count medical negligence suit seeks more than $50,000 on each count, plus the costs of the suit.

Hospital in Florida cleared of medical malpractice over deportation

A jury decided Monday that a Stuart, Florida hospital which moved a brain damaged illegal immigrant in its care back to Central America despite protest from his legal guardian did not commit medical malpractice. The suit is one of thousands of medical malpractice and birth injury cases filed against Florida hospitals this year.

The clerk of the Court reported that the 6-person jury ruled unanimously in favor of the hospital.

The case centered around 37-year-old Luis Jimenez, a Mayan Indian from Guatemala. The hospital had cared for the uninsured illegal immigrant for three years, however, it was not able to find a nursing home or health care facility to take him permanently because his immigration status meant the government would not reimburse his care.

"Hospitals are not intended to become long-term housing," said Linda Quick, president of the South Florida Hospital & Healthcare Association. "The issue is that there are no long-term providers required to take people for whom they know they are not going to be paid."

The case, filed by Jimenez's cousin, Montejo Gaspar, who became his legal guardian after a brain injury, sought nearly $1 million to cover the estimated lifetime costs of Jimenez's care in Guatemala, as well as damages.

The hospital said it was merely following a court order - which was being appealed at the time - and that Jimenez wanted to go home. Gaspar's attorney Bill King said he was extremely disappointed with the ruling and was reviewing all options including whether to appeal.

State Supreme Court overturns $75 million medical malpractice verdict

A lawsuit which awarded $75 million to the parents of a child who suffered a birth injury due to medical malpractice was overturned last week by the New Jersey Supreme Court. Damages have been awarded for similar cases in Florida. Lawyers for the family did not comment.

The Court cited numerous trial errors as well as other problems in reversing the substantial award. In their decision, they stated the jury was improperly exposed to bias against medical professionals and Saint Barnabas Medical Center during the jury selection process.

The award had been given to the parents of a boy who suffered brain damage as an infant when he was deprived of oxygen during surgery in 1998. According to court documents, the child now suffers from significant intellectual, verbal and neuron motor deficiencies and requires constant care.

The case was remanded for another trial.

Saint Barnabas Medical Center, an affiliate of the Saint Barnabas Health Care System, is a 597-bed non-profit major teaching hospital located in Livingston, New Jersey. It is the oldest and largest nonprofit, nonsectarian hospital in New Jersey.

Navy settles birth injury suit with North Florida family

Nearly 11 months after their son died at Jacksonville Naval Hospital, the parents who brought a medical malpractice claim against the hospital have settled their suit. Almost a year after their son died, the parents of a boy born at Jacksonville Naval Hospital have settled a medical malpractice lawsuit with the hospital for $500,000.

Joseph and Kendra Alcorn, who previously lived in Orange Park, Florida, came to an agreement last week with the U.S. Attorney's Office, who represents the hospital, to resolve the lawsuit for $500,000.

Following a high-danger pregnancy, Kendra Alcorn gave birth to twins in 2005. The first infant was born healthy, but the youngest child suffered from lack of oxygen.

Sean Cronin, the lawyer representing the Alcorn’s, argued that the hospital staff was negligent by not preventing the oxygen deficiency, which caused the boy to develop blindness and cerebral palsy. He died on Sept. 27, 2008, at just over three years old.

New bill becomes law, will limit medical malpractice suits in AZ

Arizona has now passed a law with similar intentions to the 2003 Florida Medical Malpractice changes, aimed at reducing claims. The bill will make it more difficult to recover damages from emergency medical providers alleged of medical malpractice. The law may also affect birth injuries in emergency situations.

The bill, approved by the state legislature and signed by governor Jan Brewer last week, will raise the burden on the victim or their family to prove that care was negligent. Senator Carolyn Allen of Scottsdale (R), justified her legislation as something that would help draw more emergency room physicians to practice in Arizona.

Attorneys who represent victims of medical injuries or death, however, worry that the changes will deprive Arizonans of their opportunity to recover damages.

The state passed similar legislation in 2006, however it was vetoed by then governor Janet Napolitano. In 2007 it was narrowly voted down in the House. The new law takes effect on Sept. 30.

What is causing the increase in C-Section deliveries?

About ten years ago 20% of women having a baby underwent a C-section. Now, the number is getting closer to 50%. Experts believe the trend increase is due to more high-risk pregnancies, fear of medical malpractice and birth injury lawsuits and the habit of patients wanting a scheduled delivery.

All of this has led to an increase in health care costs with extended hospital stays, more pain in recovery, as well as the overall risks associated with any surgery. C-sections are now the second-most popular surgical procedure for women according to the National Center for Health Statistics. Ten years ago, it was third.

A major reason for the jump is the fear of a birth injury lawsuit. While every doctor has the threat of being sued for malpractice, OB-GYNs are among those most commonly sued. C-sections may limit those fears since it is performed in a controlled environment.

“Rather than incur the risk, increasing numbers of obstetricians are bypassing natural childbirth in favor of C-sections,” explains Mike Matray, editor of The Medical Liability Monitor, a publication on malpractice issues.

But C-sections also have their own risks, from infection to blood clots and even death from complications of the surgery or anesthesia, according to a 2006 study by the Childbirth Connection. Obstetric and gynecologic surgery had the most malpractice claims of the 28 medical specialties studied from 1985 to 2007 by the Data Sharing Project of the Physician Insurers Association of America.

“It doesn’t take an economist to see that high (medical-malpractice) premiums have an effect on the high price of health care,” he said.

Hospital Medical Malpractice by technician leads to hepatitis scare in Denver

Denver residents are in shock at learning that a drug-addicted scrub technician at a local hospital may have exposed about 6,000 patients to hepatitis C when she allegedly passed on dirty syringes that she had used to patients. Experts are calling it one of the worst medical malpractice cases ever in the area. Mistakes by drug-addicted staff have also led to birth injuries in some cases.

The technician, 26 year-old Kristen Diane Parker, has been incarcerated. Parker told police that she kept dirty saline-filled syringes in her pocket and watched for opportunities when doctors and nurses left the room. She then allegedly stole syringes filled with Fentanyl from operating carts and replaced them with the used syringes.

Several thousand worried patients have been tested for hepatitis and are questioning two area hospitals about how this could have happened. At least ten cases have been linked to Rose Medical Center, where Parker worked until April. State health experts are trying to determine if the ten hepatitis C cases are actually linked to Parker. One problem is that many people with hepatitis C don’t know they are infected at first since they don’t develop symptoms for years.

"I didn’t want to make it obvious to everyone that I was using," Parker told police in an interview, saying she stole between 15 and 20 syringes of Fentanyl. "I knew my limit."

Hepatitis C is a treatable but incurable blood-borne disease that can cause serious liver problems. Parker’s case may end up being the only one so far in Colorado where a patient got infected from a health care worker who was tampering with drugs, said Dr. Ned Calonge, chief medical officer for the state health department.

A factor that could lead to more serious charges is whether Parker knew she was infected with hepatitis C. She did test positive for the disease prior to starting her job in October, but didn’t follow up with treatment since she didn’t have health insurance or money for a doctor. She also claimed hospital officials didn’t make it clear she tested positive.

A federal magistrate judge disagreed and declared her a danger to the community and ordered her held without bond, saying her actions showed significant disregard for the safety of others. Her next hearing is Oct. 6. Those infected with hepatitis C are not barred from working in health services, so long as standard precautions are taken, according to the CDC.

Doctor to testify against his own clinic for hepatitis Medical Malpractice

A doctor from the Endoscopy Center of Southern Nevada has agreed to testify against his colleagues to The Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners regarding the medical malpractice that led to last year’s hepatitis C outbreak. The Board disciplines doctors in the state whose practices lead to medical or birth injury. Florida has a similar board.

The board will punish Dr. Eladio Carrera with only a light fine of $15,000 for three counts of bringing the medical profession into disrepute in exchange for his testimony against Dr. Desai, majority owner of the clinic, and Dr. Clifford Carrol, who is accused of causing the outbreak through his negligent treatment of a patient with hepatitis C.

“Our investigation shows he has a substantially different responsibility for the infections than the other two physicians involved,” said Louis Ling, executive director of the medical board. “He is willing to testify truthfully against the other two doctors and give us a context for the case that nobody else can give us.”

It is estimated that approximately 100 people were infected with hepatitis C when nurses treating an infected patient of Carrol’s reused syringes and single-use medicine vials. As a result, an anesthetic that was given to other patients was contaminated. In February 2008, approximately 50,000 people who had been treated at the clinic had to be told to get tested for hepatitis B, hepatitis C and HIV.

Doctor reporting encouraging results from Stem Cell treatment of Cerebral Palsy

A California doctor performing transplants of bone marrow containing stem cells believes he has found a key to helping victims of Cerebral Palsy. The birth injury affects thousands every year and is often caused by a mistake or medical malpractice of the delivery physician.

Dr. David Steenblock of Mission Viejo, California, an early leader in using clinical applications of stem cells, is reporting the results of a procedure on a 16 year-old girl who was suffering with cerebral palsy. The patient experienced right side paralysis and spasticity ever since birth. The procedure Dr. Steenblock performed consisted of removing 300 milliliters of bone marrow from her hip, then injecting it in her through an IV.

Five hours following the raw bone marrow injection, the patient began moving her right toe for the first time ever. By that night, she was walking using her right foot. The day following the procedure, she was able to straighten out and use her right arm and wrist for the first time. Within three weeks, she was also able to move her fingers on her right hand and hold a cup for the first time.

"This has been the easiest and most successful treatment she has ever received!" The patient’s mother exclaimed.

The dramatic success of this procedure will lead to further testing and open other options for treatment of cerebral palsy. The key is the patient’s own bone marrow, which contains stem cells. When reintroduced back to the same patient intravenously, these cells reportedly migrate to injured areas and repair tissue(s) that are damaged, even if the damage occurred decades ago.

Pennsylvania woman’s death caused by Motorcycle Accident

A Pennsylvania woman was killed last week in an accident when she was tossed as a passenger from a motorcycle. It was unclear if any cars were involved in the accident and personal injury lawyers were looking into whether it was a wrongful death.

46 year old Martha Nye died at the scene of the accident in Darlington, according to state police. The driver of the motorcycle, Troy Gower, lost control and ran off the road, then they were both thrown from it.

Nye was not wearing a helmet and died as a result of a blow to the head. Gower was flown to a nearby hospital and was expected to survive.

New Surgery may help children with birth injuries regain control

A doctor in China has developed a new surgery that may help children who suffered a spinal cord birth injury or spina bifida regain control of their bladder and bowel function. The condition can occur in around 2 of every 1,000 births when an infant’s spinal cord is damaged while pushing through an opening that is too small. This can sometimes occur when a doctor commits medical malpractice by failing to perform a c-section.

Many kids affected by spina bifida or spinal birth injuries develop bladder and bowel problems and there are few treatment options. A new experimental surgery, however, called the Xiao procedure, may help. Named after Chuan-Guo Xiao, a urologist in China, the surgery involves rewiring nerves in the spinal cord.

"There has been very little progress over the past several decades in the treatment of bladder dysfunction," Gerald Tuite, M.D., a pediatric neurosurgeon at All Children's Hospital in St. Petersburg, Fla., said. "The use of catheters was a huge breakthrough many years ago, but since then there have been medicines and other experimental things tried, but nothing has given people control of their bladder."

"We take a small portion of the nerve that usually controls motor function or movement in the leg and we cut it and splice it to a nerve that usually controls bowel and bladder function," Dr. Tuite explained.

If it works for patients with spinal cord injuries, they will be able to activate their bladder and bowels by vigorously scratching a spot on his or her thigh.

"Patients who have spina bifida, professor Xiao has told us that it's not necessary for them to scratch in a certain distribution; that they will just regain control of their bowel and bladder spontaneously," Dr. Tuite said.

An early study of the surgery showed that patients who are able to walk risk developing leg weakness from the procedure.

"Dr. Xiao has told us while initially they have weakness, over time the nervous system is able to compensate for that and usually … their foot function returns to where it was; but we as part of this study want to be absolutely sure we know what the risks are," Dr. Tuite said.

The safety and effectiveness of the procedure is currently being tested at All Children's Hospital in Tampa, Fla.

Medical Malpractice costs healthcare system $151 billion per year

Talks about the nationalization of healthcare have recently brought a number of new issues to the table, with medical malpractice being the most talked about.

While the AMA (American Medical Association) and some physicians contend that medical malpractice contributes to increased costs in healthcare, others say that is a falsehood.

"Oftentimes, patients don't realize that just because the results aren't perfect, it's not malpractice," said Victor Ching, president of the medical staff at San Antonio Community Hospital. "You can't guarantee a perfect result, and so it's not necessarily negligence. Sometimes it just happens."

According to the AMA, liability issues from med mal increase health system costs by as much as $151 billion per year.

Florida spine surgeon sued again for medical malpractice, drawing concern

A Florida surgeon who performs back surgeries on patients from around the world, despite questionable qualifications and having been sued numerous times, has been named in another medical malpractice lawsuit. Florida is home to numerous malpractice and birth injury claims. In the suit, Michigan woman claims Dr. Alfred Bonati performed 13 surgeries on her over a period of 7 months, and tried to hide her in a private condominium for 6 weeks following a botched operation.

Stacy Mahan, a 41-year-old RN, came to Dr. Bonati after finding him on the Internet. The suit names the doctor, several of his staff, as well as Maxim Healthcare Services and its home health care division. The doctors’ Bonati Institute, holds itself out as a practice that specializes in minimally invasive back surgery, using patented tools and techniques for outpatient operations.

Lawyers for the plaintiff recalled accounts from patients of the doctor, who described their initial encounters as "a seduction." "They have gone through more conventional treatments and still have pain. They're told, 'Dr. Bonati is God, and he will fix you.' If you're the person who's been through hell, this is exactly what you want to hear."

Bonati's lawyer said last week that she had not seen a copy of the complaint and could not comment on it. Maxim Health Resources did not return calls for comment.

According to the lawsuit, Mahan first visited the doctor for moderate lower spinal and back, hip, and left leg pain. After diagnostic testing, she underwent a series of surgeries, some of which "caused or produced" an injury to the covering of Mahan's spine, which resulted in leaking spinal fluid.

"The number of operations carried out on Mahan is in keeping with a pattern of practice including multiple operations on virtually each patient seen and treated at the Bonati Institute and Gulf Coast Orthopedic Center over many years," the lawsuit said.

"Regardless of whether or not such practice is or is not appropriate conduct and practice for a spine surgeon (even a 'minimally invasive one')," the lawsuit states, "none of the operations done after 2/20/07 by Bonati could have been reasonably expected to address the problems both created by and identified by previous operations carried out by Bonati on Mahan."

The lawsuit also claims Mahan was housed in a private condo, where she received care from nurses employed by Maxim Health Services.

"Her severity of illness was far beyond the ability to care for her medically and/or surgically in a hotel/motel/condominium location," the lawsuit said. The complaint accused Bonati, who does not have hospital admitting privileges, of "trying to hide his mistakes" by putting Mahan in the "off-site private, unsanitary condominium."

The lawsuit also raises some shocking claims about the doctor’s past in addition to the malpractice charge, for example:

• That he fraudulently entered the United States from Chile, failed the American Board of Orthopedic Surgery exam twice, then created his own board and certified himself;
• That to be accepted in Cook County Hospital's training program, he falsely represented in writing that he attended Catholic University in Rome, later admitting that the university was bogus; and that he later claimed to have attended the University of Naples in Italy, which in litigation he admitted was bogus and that he doesn't even know if it exists;
• That he falsified recommendation letters to get into medical school at Wake Forest University. The lawsuit says two doctors whom Bonati claimed to have drafted and signed the letters denied doing so in court depositions.
• That he was placed on academic probation at Wake Forest, and while there submitted false information to obtain medical licenses in North Carolina and Florida, which "he still holds by renewal."

High Court Throws out Malpractice Ruling that favored Orthopedic

A New Jersey appellate court last week through out a 2007 medical malpractice ruling that exonerated a Vineland orthopedic surgeon from liability, saying that the jury had been given improper instructions. Such decisions are common in medical malpractice and birth injury cases.

In their ruling, the three member appellate panel of judges found that the lower Court Judge erred in instructing the jury on how they should decide whether Dr. Seth Silver, of the South Jersey Center for Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, caused Anthony Gonzalez Jr. to suffer a permanent injury to his elbow.

The case was remanded back to the lower court in Cumberland County for a possible retrial.

Jeffrey Keiser, the lawyer representing Gonzalez, was happy that his client's rights had been protected. "The court's opinion on the jury charge was rather extensive and well-reasoned and set a long history of precedents as to why the court felt the way it did and why the case required reversal," he said.

New treatment uses hypothermia to save infants

Neonatologists from the University of Pittsburgh announced last week that they have developed a new treatment that utilizes intentionally induced hypothermia to help save infants with brain injuries.

The specialists are using specially designed cooling units at the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh and Magee-Womens Hospital to cause hypothermia in newborns suffering from brain injuries caused by lack of oxygen at birth. The affliction is also called hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy. The treatment involves chilling infants to 92.3 degrees for 72 hours. The Children’s Hospital has already treated 4 infants with the process.

Brain injuries occur in about 1 to 2 of every 1,000 births where infants are carried to term. They are fatal in 40 percent of infants and can contribute to long-term disabilities in around 40 percent of babies who survive. They are one of the most serious types of birth injury and are often caused by medical malpractice, or negligence by the health care provider.

"For the best chance of success, infants should be treated with whole-body cooling within six hours of life," explained Dr. Richard Telesco, who developed the method.

"It's vital that health professionals are made aware of this treatment so that it can be administered within that six-hour window. It has been extensively studied and found to be both safe and effective and reduces mortality or long-term disabilities in about 25 percent of infants."

$5M Settlement in Birth Injury Case

An appellate court in Great Britain approved a settlement of approximately $5 million last week in a case involving a 24 year old gentleman who suffered brain damage during birth.

Victim Geoff Sadlier, sued the Mid-Western Health Board in a birth injury medical malpractice claim. During the case he presented evidence showing he had suffered mild cerebral palsy due to a lack of oxygen at birth, He was born in 1985 at the Limerick Regional Maternity Hospital.

The case alleged negligence and medical malpractice for the birth injury due to the actions or inaction of the attending health professionals. The victim also demonstrated that he would need extensive care in the future due to his condition. Lawyers for the victim said they were pleased with the results of the case.

$7M Lawsuit against Teenager

The family of the truck driver who died after his rig plunged into the Chesapeake Bay following a crash on the Bay Bridge last year has filed a $7 million lawsuit against the teenager responsible.

Relatives of John Short, 57, claim that Candy Lynn Baldwin, 19, had been drinking so much the night of the wreck that she swerved into Short's lane, forcing him to crash through a bridge wall and fall to his death.

Attorney Keith Franz announced the lawsuit yesterday outside Queen Anne's Circuit Court in Centreville. Short's wife Connie and daughter, Renee, attended, but declined to comment.

The fatal wreck also revealed problems in the bridge's aging infrastructure, which the Maryland Transportation Authority was forced to address. The state was not named in the civil lawsuit, but it may be added later, Franz said.

The civil lawsuit comes six months after prosecutors decided not to charge Baldwin, of Millington in Kent County, with auto manslaughter, since her blood-alcohol content was below the state's legal limit for drunken driving. Baldwin paid $470 in fines after pleading guilty to negligent driving, failure to drive right of center and violating a license restriction. She had a .036 blood alcohol level two hours after the wreck, below the state's legal limit of .08.

But Franz argued that Baldwin's alcohol levels would have been higher if the test had been given immediately after the crash.

He also provided a series of pictures taken from Baldwin's MySpace page that shows her drinking alcohol alone and with her brother, and holding a bottle of rum while behind the wheel of a car. In one photo, she provided the caption, "I DEFINITELY want someone who can handle my drinking habits. And keep up with me."

The pictures were later removed from Baldwin's site.

"It's disgusting, in all candor, the manner in which she explains her excessive use of alcohol," Franz said.

He also noted the emotional toll Short's death has had on the family.

"They had no opportunity to say goodbye, to tell him they loved him. ... They say time heals all wounds, but I can tell you from the many clients we've had (in cases like this), people have a pain that never heals."

Steven Allen, Baldwin's Towson attorney, said he had not seen the lawsuit, so he could not respond to it directly. He said that Baldwin is sorry for what happened.

"This is a very tragic event," Allen said. "(Baldwin's) prayers and thoughts have been with the Short family since the event first took place and they continue to be on her mind every day. She thinks about Mr. Short and his family every day and is very concerned about them."

Baldwin told police she left her mother's wedding reception in Millington on Aug. 9, then went with her cousin to Iguana Cantina in Baltimore. She said she drank three beers at the reception and one at the bar, where she used a fake ID to get served, Franz said.

By 3:45 a.m. Aug. 10, Baldwin was driving her 1997 Chevrolet Camaro with her 22-year-old cousin asleep in the passenger seat. Baldwin told police officers she was extremely tired, but couldn't find a place to pull over, so she traveled eastbound across the Bay Bridge while two-way traffic was in effect.

Short, a driver for Delaware-based Mountaire Farms who lived in Wicomico County, was traveling westbound on the bridge with a load of 24,000 pounds of refrigerated chicken.

He hadn't planned to drive the route, but agreed to do so after he was needed to cover for another driver, police said.

Baldwin dozed off on the bridge and veered across the center line, into the path of Short's truck. She told officers she woke up just in time to see that she was in the wrong lane and driving toward the truck.

Police said Short tried to avoid the car, scraping the concrete barrier on his right so that he only swiped the driver's side of Baldwin's car. He lost control, veered left and clipped the passenger side of another vehicle before smashing through the opposite Jersey wall and landing 30 feet below, in the Chesapeake Bay.

Short was able to unfasten his seat belt, was trapped inside the cab of his trailer and drowned, according to the lawsuit.

Lisa Spicknall, a victim advocate for the anti-drunken-driving group MADD Maryland, said tragedies like this show how dangerous underage drinking can be.

"Our belief is that anyone drinking and driving should be punished to the fullest extent of the law," she said. "It's a horrifying experience to see these pictures (of Baldwin drinking). We try to use every avenue to reach youth and show them that underage drinking does have consequences."

Man Struck by Police Car

A “frozen finger” resulting from a pedestrian accident involving Charlottesville police has hurt a city man’s art career and damaged his reputation, according to the man’s lawsuit.

Gerald Mitchell filed a $850,000 lawsuit Tuesday in Charlottesville Circuit Court against Albemarle County police Officer Greg C. Davis, city police Officer Steve H. Grissom and the city. The wheelchair-bound Charlottesville man was hit in a crosswalk by a police vehicle in November 2007.

According to his suit, Mitchell suffered physical and mental anguish as a result of being struck while traversing a crosswalk at West Main and Fourth streets at about 10:40 a.m. Nov. 5, 2007.

While Mitchell was crossing the street, Davis made a left turn in the police car from Fourth Street onto West Main. The car hit the back of Mitchell’s wheelchair, ejecting Mitchell and throwing him to the ground.

The suit accuses Grissom, who arrived after the accident, of working with Davis and other Charlottesville police officers to charge Mitchell in the accident. Mitchell was accused of crossing the street against the pedestrian signal, not pressing the button to activate the pedestrian signal and not yielding to a pedestrian, as his wheelchair is considered a vehicle.

Mitchell later was found not guilty, according to the suit, which called the charges “an abuse of power” by the police. Defense attorney Richard Armstrong said Mitchell was the victim of the car accident and shouldn’t have been charged in the first place. “If everyone came out and said, ‘Sorry, we made a mistake,’ this would have been resolved a long time ago,” Armstrong said. “Mr. Mitchell feels outraged that police officers protect their own in this way and that he has to defend himself. Apparently there are no ramifications in either the city or the county police department.”

Mitchell referred questions to his attorney.

City spokesman Ric Barrick said the city doesn’t comment on pending lawsuits, and noted that the city had not received the paperwork for the suit. County spokeswoman Lee Catlin said the county hasn’t been served with the suit, but that Davis would be provided with legal representation per county policy.

Armstrong said Mitchell had been working with both localities in hopes of having his medical bills paid and “for someone to acknowledge that what happened wasn’t right.” Mitchell was inspired to file the suit after a June 1 accident in which a teenage driver hit a woman crossing South Street, Armstrong said. The driver was charged with failure to yield to a pedestrian.

The city and county may have been expecting Mitchell to file suit. Armstrong said he had been in contact with both localities to try to work something out. Charlottesville Police Chief Timothy J. Longo also wrote a memo to the City Council in December 2007 indicating that city Commonwealth’s Attorney Dave Chapman thought the issue would likely be resolved “in the context of a civil proceeding, as opposed to a criminal prosecution for a violation of the traffic code.”

As a result of the accident, Armstrong said, Mitchell suffered a broken shoulder and a “frozen finger” that prevented him from attending a prestigious art show in Harlem, N.Y. “This was quite a personal damage to him,” Armstrong said. “Once you’ve done that [show], you’ve made it into the art world. He did suffer damage to his career.”

The lawsuit also said Mitchell suffered from “depression-like symptoms, nervousness, nightmares and flashbacks” after the accident. Armstrong said Mitchell returned to the hospital again because of accident-related issues and almost lost a foot from pressure sores that he developed as a result of being confined to a hospital bed. A court date has not been set in the case.

EIU Student Killed

The parents of Eastern Illinois University graduate students who died in a wrong-way accident have sued the driver of the other vehicle – a police officer – for wrongful death.

The lawsuit was filed Monday in St. Louis County against 41-year-old Christine Miller, a suburban St. Louis police officer.

Morgan Freeman Crash

An attorney for Academy Award-winning actor Morgan Freeman on Friday claimed a woman who was with the actor when he wrecked a car in Mississippi was partly to blame for the accident.

Attorney Jack Hayes, Jr. didn’t elaborate on how Demaris Meyer, who was in the car with Freeman when it ran off the road and flipped, may have helped cause the accident. Meyer is suing Freeman in U.S. District Court in Oxford, Miss. for negligence.

Both Meyer and Freeman were seriously injured during the accident, which occurred about five miles from his home.

Meyer sued Freeman in February for medical expenses, pain and suffering, lost wages, permanent disability and property damage.

Officer Drunk at Bar

An off-duty Sunset Hills officer drank heavily at a bar down the road from her police station before causing a wrong-way accident in March that killed four people in Des Peres, according to a lawsuit filed Monday.

The suit claims Christine L. Miller drank "a high quantity" of alcohol at O'Leary's Restaurant & Bar, located in a strip mall in the 3800 block of South Lindbergh Boulevard. The bar is about 1,000 feet from the Sunset Hills police station.

Miller, 41, is being sued for wrongful death and personal injury by parents of the four people killed in the March 21 accident and a survivor. The suit accuses Miller of negligence based on allegations of driving drunk and driving on the wrong side of the road, among other things.

Police have said Miller posted a blood-alcohol count of .169 three hours after the crash, more than twice the legal limit of .08.

The lawsuit says Miller, a Sunset Hills, Mo., police officer who listed a home address in Kirkwood, Mo., was drinking heavily at a bar near her police station before driving on the wrong side of a road early March 21 and slamming into another vehicle.

Wrongful Death

3

New York City Crash

2

Children to Blame for Accident

1